Copyright 2003 SHEPARD'S - 955 Citing references

Barron v. Baltimore, 32 U.S. 243, 7 Peters 243, 8 L. Ed. 672, 1833 U.S. LEXIS 346 (1833)

SHEPARD'S(R) Signal: Warning: Negative treatment is indicated
Restrictions: Unrestricted
FOCUS(TM) Terms: No FOCUS terms
Print Format: FULL
Citing Ref. Signal: Hidden

PRIOR HISTORY ( 0 citing references )

(CITATION YOU ENTERED):
Barron v. Baltimore, 32 U.S. 243, 7 Peters 243, 8 L. Ed. 672, 1833 U.S. LEXIS 346 (1833)

CITING DECISIONS ( 378 citing decisions )

U.S. SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Atwater v. City of Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318, 149 L. Ed. 2d 549, 121 S. Ct. 1536, 2001 U.S. LEXIS 3366, 69 U.S.L.W. 4262, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 193, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3203, 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2069, 2001 D.A.R. 3953 (2001)
Cited by:
532 U.S. 318 p.339
149 L. Ed. 2d 549 p.567
121 S. Ct. 1536 p.1549

Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes, Ltd., 526 U.S. 687, 143 L. Ed. 2d 882, 119 S. Ct. 1624, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 3631, 67 U.S.L.W. 4345, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 247, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3846, 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 3019, 99 D.A.R. 4908, 48 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1513, 29 Envtl. L. Rep. 21133 (1999)
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
526 U.S. 687 p.715
143 L. Ed. 2d 882 p.909
119 S. Ct. 1624 p.1641
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
526 U.S. 687 p.745
143 L. Ed. 2d 882 p.928
119 S. Ct. 1624 p.1656

Cited by:
United States v. Balsys, 524 U.S. 666, 141 L. Ed. 2d 575, 118 S. Ct. 2218, 1998 U.S. LEXIS 4210, 66 U.S.L.W. 4613, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 708, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4936, 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 3303, 98 D.A.R. 6916, 49 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 371 (1998)
Cited by:
141 L. Ed. 2d 575 p.586
118 S. Ct. 2218 p.2224
524 U.S. 666 p.675

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779, 131 L. Ed. 2d 881, 115 S. Ct. 1842, 1995 U.S. LEXIS 3487, 63 U.S.L.W. 4413, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 29, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3790, 95 D.A.R. 6496 (1995)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
131 L. Ed. 2d 881 p.941
115 S. Ct. 1842 p.1887
514 U.S. 779 p.871

Cited by:
Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Feeney, 495 U.S. 299, 109 L. Ed. 2d 264, 110 S. Ct. 1868, 1990 U.S. LEXIS 2294, 58 U.S.L.W. 4536 (1990)
Cited by:
495 U.S. 299 p.315
109 L. Ed. 2d 264 p.279

Cited by:
Browning-Ferris Indus. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257, 106 L. Ed. 2d 219, 109 S. Ct. 2909, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 3285, 57 U.S.L.W. 4985, 1989-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P68630 (1989)
Cited by:
492 U.S. 257 p.266
106 L. Ed. 2d 219 p.232

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 89 L. Ed. 2d 674, 106 S. Ct. 1431, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 94, 54 U.S.L.W. 4347, 20 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 1 (1986)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
475 U.S. 673 p.705
89 L. Ed. 2d 674 p.700

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170, 80 L. Ed. 2d 214, 104 S. Ct. 1735, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 55, 52 U.S.L.W. 4425 (1984)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
466 U.S. 170 p.186
80 L. Ed. 2d 214 p.229

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1019, 103 S. Ct. 3330, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 107, 51 U.S.L.W. 5162 (1983)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
463 U.S. 783 p.816
77 L. Ed. 2d 1019 p.1043

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325, 75 L. Ed. 2d 96, 103 S. Ct. 1108, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 146, 51 U.S.L.W. 4247 (1983)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
460 U.S. 325 p.356
75 L. Ed. 2d 96 p.121

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Thomas v. Review Bd. of Indiana Employment Sec. Div., 450 U.S. 707, 67 L. Ed. 2d 624, 101 S. Ct. 1425, 1981 U.S. LEXIS 11, 49 U.S.L.W. 4341, 25 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P31662, 25 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 629 (1981)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
450 U.S. 707 p.721
67 L. Ed. 2d 624 p.636

Cited by:
Monell v. Department of Social Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 56 L. Ed. 2d 611, 98 S. Ct. 2018, 1978 U.S. LEXIS 100, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P8345, 17 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 873 (1978)
Cited by:
436 U.S. 658 p.686
56 L. Ed. 2d 611 p.633

Explained by:
United States Steel Corp. v. Multistate Tax Comm'n, 434 U.S. 452, 54 L. Ed. 2d 682, 98 S. Ct. 799, 1978 U.S. LEXIS 58 (1978)
Explained by:
434 U.S. 452 p.467
54 L. Ed. 2d 682 p.698

Cited by:
Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic Nat'l Committee, 412 U.S. 94, 36 L. Ed. 2d 772, 93 S. Ct. 2080, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 4, 1 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1855, 27 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 907 (1973)
Cited by:
412 U.S. 94 p.156
36 L. Ed. 2d 772 p.814

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Super 8mm Film, 413 U.S. 123, 37 L. Ed. 2d 500, 93 S. Ct. 2665, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 124 (1973)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
413 U.S. 123 p.132
37 L. Ed. 2d 500 p.508

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 20 L. Ed. 2d 491, 88 S. Ct. 1444, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1631, 45 Ohio Op. 2d 198 (1968)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
391 U.S. 145 p.173
20 L. Ed. 2d 491 p.510

Cited by:
Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1, 12 L. Ed. 2d 653, 84 S. Ct. 1489, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 993 (1964)
Cited by:
378 U.S. 1 p.4
12 L. Ed. 2d 653 p.657

Cited by:
School Dist. v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203, 10 L. Ed. 2d 844, 83 S. Ct. 1560, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2611 (1963)
Cited by:
374 U.S. 203 p.253
10 L. Ed. 2d 844 p.876

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497, 6 L. Ed. 2d 989, 81 S. Ct. 1752, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1953 (1961)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
367 U.S. 497 p.539
6 L. Ed. 2d 989 p.1017

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Cohen v. Hurley, 366 U.S. 117, 6 L. Ed. 2d 156, 81 S. Ct. 954, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1960 (1961)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
366 U.S. 117 p.141
366 U.S. 117 p.154
6 L. Ed. 2d 156 p.172
6 L. Ed. 2d 156 p.179

Cited by:
Smith v. California, 361 U.S. 147, 4 L. Ed. 2d 205, 80 S. Ct. 215, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1885, 14 Ohio Op. 2d 459 (1959)
Cited by:
361 U.S. 147 p.158
4 L. Ed. 2d 205 p.214

Cited by:
Knapp v. Schweitzer, 357 U.S. 371, 2 L. Ed. 2d 1393, 78 S. Ct. 1302, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1800, 42 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2330, 35 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P71632 (1958)
Cited by:
357 U.S. 371 p.376
2 L. Ed. 2d 1393 p.1399

Cited by:
Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 1 L. Ed. 2d 1148, 77 S. Ct. 1222, 1957 U.S. LEXIS 729 (1957)
Cited by:
354 U.S. 1 p.7
1 L. Ed. 2d 1148 p.1158

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Irvine v. California, 347 U.S. 128, 98 L. Ed. 561, 74 S. Ct. 381, 1954 U.S. LEXIS 2750 (1954)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
347 U.S. 128 p.141

Cited by:
Public Utilities Comm'n v. Pollak, 343 U.S. 451, 96 L. Ed. 1068, 72 S. Ct. 813, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2061 (1952)
Cited by:
343 U.S. 451 p.462
96 L. Ed. 1068 p.1077

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Dice v. Akron, C. & Y. R. Co., 342 U.S. 359, 96 L. Ed. 398, 72 S. Ct. 312, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2462, 47 Ohio Op. 53, 63 Ohio Law Abs. 161 (1952)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
342 U.S. 359 p.366

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46, 91 L. Ed. 1903, 67 S. Ct. 1672, 1947 U.S. LEXIS 2876, 171 A.L.R. 1223 (1947)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
332 U.S. 46 p.68
332 U.S. 46 p.95
332 U.S. 46 p.113
91 L. Ed. 1903 p.1917
91 L. Ed. 1903 p.1932
91 L. Ed. 1903 p.1941
Cited by:
332 U.S. 46 p.51
91 L. Ed. 1903 p.1908

Cited by:
Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 91 L. Ed. 711, 67 S. Ct. 504, 1947 U.S. LEXIS 2959, 168 A.L.R. 1392 (1947)
Cited by:
330 U.S. 1 p.13
91 L. Ed. 711 p.722

Cited by:
Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678, 90 L. Ed. 939, 66 S. Ct. 773, 1946 U.S. LEXIS 2569, 13 A.L.R.2d 383 (1946)
Cited by:
327 U.S. 678 p.685
90 L. Ed. 939 p.945

Cited by:
Feldman v. United States, 322 U.S. 487, 88 L. Ed. 1408, 64 S. Ct. 1082, 1944 U.S. LEXIS 1287, 154 A.L.R. 982 (1944)
Cited by:
322 U.S. 487 p.490
88 L. Ed. 1408 p.1413

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105, 87 L. Ed. 1292, 63 S. Ct. 870, 1943 U.S. LEXIS 711, 146 A.L.R. 81 (1943)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
319 U.S. 105 p.125
87 L. Ed. 1292 p.1306

Cited by:
Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 82 L. Ed. 1461, 58 S. Ct. 1019, 1938 U.S. LEXIS 896, 146 A.L.R. 357 (1938)
Cited by:
304 U.S. 458 p.463
82 L. Ed. 1461 p.1466

Cited by:
United Gas Public Service Co. v. Texas, 303 U.S. 123, 82 L. Ed. 702, 58 S. Ct. 483, 1938 U.S. LEXIS 228 (1938)
Cited by:
303 U.S. 123 p.151
82 L. Ed. 702 p.721

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697, 75 L. Ed. 1357, 51 S. Ct. 625, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 175, 1 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1001 (1931)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
283 U.S. 697 p.723
75 L. Ed. 1357 p.1371

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
King Mfg. Co. v. City Council of Augusta, 277 U.S. 100, 72 L. Ed. 801, 48 S. Ct. 489, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 679 (1928)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
277 U.S. 100 p.118
72 L. Ed. 801 p.811

Cited by:
Nelson v. California, 273 U.S. 641, 71 L. Ed. 818, 47 S. Ct. 106, 1926 U.S. LEXIS 64 (1926)
Cited by:
273 U.S. 641 p.641
71 L. Ed. 818 p.818

Followed by:
Donohue v. Maine, 269 U.S. 531, 70 L. Ed. 397, 46 S. Ct. 22, 1925 U.S. LEXIS 44 (1925)
Followed by:
269 U.S. 531 p.532
70 L. Ed. 397 p.397

Followed by:
United States v. Lanza, 260 U.S. 377, 67 L. Ed. 314, 43 S. Ct. 141, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2379, Treas. Dec. Int. Rev. 3423 (1922)
Followed by:
260 U.S. 377 p.382
67 L. Ed. 314 p.317

Cited by:
Palmer v. Ohio, 248 U.S. 32, 63 L. Ed. 108, 39 S. Ct. 16, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1719, 64 Week. L. Bull. 1, 16 Ohio L. Rep. 446 (1918)
Cited by:
248 U.S. 32 p.34
63 L. Ed. 108 p.109

Cited by:
Gasquet v. Lapeyre, 242 U.S. 367, 61 L. Ed. 367, 37 S. Ct. 165, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 2197 (1917)
Cited by:
242 U.S. 367 p.369
61 L. Ed. 367 p.370

Cited by:
Minneapolis & S. L. R. Co. v. Bombolis, 241 U.S. 211, 60 L. Ed. 961, 36 S. Ct. 595, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1744 (1916)
Cited by:
241 U.S. 211 p.217
60 L. Ed. 961 p.963

Cited by:
Shewalter v. Carolina, C. & O. R. Co., 239 U.S. 630, 60 L. Ed. 476, 36 S. Ct. 166, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1419 (1915)
Cited by:
239 U.S. 630 p.630
60 L. Ed. 476 p.476

Cited by:
Collins v. Johnston, 237 U.S. 502, 59 L. Ed. 1071, 35 S. Ct. 649, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1360 (1915)
Cited by:
237 U.S. 502 p.511
59 L. Ed. 1071 p.1079

Cited by:
Mohawk Overall Co. v. Hooker, Corser & Mitchell Co., 235 U.S. 685, 59 L. Ed. 424, 35 S. Ct. 202, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 918 (1914)
Cited by:
235 U.S. 685 p.685
59 L. Ed. 424 p.424

Cited by:
Ensign v. Pennsylvania, 227 U.S. 592, 57 L. Ed. 658, 33 S. Ct. 321, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2334, 30 Am. B.R. 408 (1913)
Cited by:
227 U.S. 592 p.597
57 L. Ed. 658 p.661

Cited by:
Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78, 53 L. Ed. 97, 29 S. Ct. 14, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1528 (1908)
Cited by:
211 U.S. 78 p.93
53 L. Ed. 97 p.103

Cited by:
Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U.S. 172, 44 L. Ed. 119, 20 S. Ct. 77, 1899 U.S. LEXIS 1555, 23 N.J.L.J. 18 (1899)
Cited by:
175 U.S. 172 p.174
44 L. Ed. 119 p.120

Cited by:
Talton v. Mayes, 163 U.S. 376, 41 L. Ed. 196, 16 S. Ct. 986, 1896 U.S. LEXIS 2276 (1896)
Cited by:
163 U.S. 376 p.382
41 L. Ed. 196 p.198

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Brown v. Walker, 161 U.S. 591, 40 L. Ed. 819, 16 S. Ct. 644, 1896 U.S. LEXIS 2190 (1896)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
161 U.S. 591 p.624
40 L. Ed. 819 p.830
Cited by:
161 U.S. 591 p.606
40 L. Ed. 819 p.824

Cited by:
Miller v. Texas, 153 U.S. 535, 38 L. Ed. 812, 14 S. Ct. 874, 1894 U.S. LEXIS 2202 (1894)
Cited by:
153 U.S. 535 p.538
38 L. Ed. 812 p.813

Cited by:
Hallinger v. Davis, 146 U.S. 314, 36 L. Ed. 986, 13 S. Ct. 105, 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2199 (1892)
Cited by:
146 U.S. 314 p.320
36 L. Ed. 986 p.989

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
O'Neil v. Vermont, 144 U.S. 323, 36 L. Ed. 450, 12 S. Ct. 693, 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2082 (1892)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
144 U.S. 323 p.360
36 L. Ed. 450 p.466

Cited by:
Nashville, C. & S. L. Railway v. Alabama, 128 U.S. 96, 32 L. Ed. 352, 9 S. Ct. 28, 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2199 (1888)
Cited by:
128 U.S. 96 p.101
32 L. Ed. 352 p.354

Cited by:
Spies v. Illinois, 123 U.S. 131, 31 L. Ed. 80, 8 S. Ct. 22, 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2159 (1887)
Cited by:
123 U.S. 131 p.166
31 L. Ed. 80 p.86

Cited by:
Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252, 29 L. Ed. 615, 6 S. Ct. 580, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1760 (1886)
Cited by:
116 U.S. 252 p.265
29 L. Ed. 615 p.619

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Coleman v. Tennessee, 97 U.S. 509, 7 Otto 509, 24 L. Ed. 1118, 1878 U.S. LEXIS 1480 (1879)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
97 U.S. 509 p.539
Cited by:
24 L. Ed. 1118 p.1130

Cited by:
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 2 Otto 542, 23 L. Ed. 588, 1875 U.S. LEXIS 1794 (1876)
Cited by:
92 U.S. 542 p.552
23 L. Ed. 588 p.591

Cited by:
Edwards v. Elliott, 88 U.S. 532, 21 Wall. 532, 22 L. Ed. 487, 1874 U.S. LEXIS 1393 (1874)
Cited by:
88 U.S. 532 p.557
22 L. Ed. 487 p.492

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 16 Wall. 36, 21 L. Ed. 394, 1872 U.S. LEXIS 1139 (1873)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
83 U.S. 36 p.125
21 L. Ed. 394 p.424

Distinguished by:
Justices v. Murray, 76 U.S. 274, 9 Wall. 274, 19 L. Ed. 658, 1869 U.S. LEXIS 964 (1870)
Distinguished by:
76 U.S. 274 p.278
19 L. Ed. 658 p.660

Cited by:
Twitchell v. Commonwealth, 74 U.S. 321, 7 Wall. 321, 19 L. Ed. 223, 1868 U.S. LEXIS 1006 (1869)
Cited by:
74 U.S. 321 p.325
19 L. Ed. 223 p.224

Cited by:
Pervear v. Commonwealth, 72 U.S. 475, 5 Wall. 475, 18 L. Ed. 608, 1866 U.S. LEXIS 953 (1867)
Cited by:
72 U.S. 475 p.480
18 L. Ed. 608 p.609

Followed by:
Withers v. Buckley, 61 U.S. 84, 20 How. 84, 15 L. Ed. 816, 1857 U.S. LEXIS 433 (1858)
Followed by:
61 U.S. 84 p.90
15 L. Ed. 816 p.819

Cited by:
Smith v. Maryland, 59 U.S. 71, 18 How. 71, 15 L. Ed. 269, 1855 U.S. LEXIS 663 (1855)
Cited by:
59 U.S. 71 p.76
15 L. Ed. 269 p.272

Cited by:
East Hartford v. Hartford Bridge Co., 51 U.S. 511, 10 How. 511, 13 L. Ed. 518, 1850 U.S. LEXIS 1479 (1850)
Cited by:
51 U.S. 511 p.539
13 L. Ed. 518 p.530

Cited by:
Fox v. Ohio, 46 U.S. 410, 5 How. 410, 12 L. Ed. 213, 1847 U.S. LEXIS 320, 2 Ohio F. Dec. 499 (1847)
Cited by:
46 U.S. 410 p.434
12 L. Ed. 213 p.224

Cited by:
Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. 540, 14 Peters 540, 10 L. Ed. 579, 1840 U.S. LEXIS 387 (1840)
Cited by:
39 U.S. 540 p.582
39 U.S. 540 p.587
10 L. Ed. 579 p.602

1ST CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
Nahant v. United States, 136 F. 273, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4455, 69 L.R.A. 723 (1st Cir. Mass. 1905)
Cited by:
136 F. 273 p.281

1ST CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

Cited by:
McLaughlin by MCLaughlin v. Boston Sch. Comm., 976 F. Supp. 53, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13558 (D. Mass. 1997)
Cited by:
976 F. Supp. 53 p.74

2ND CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
Brault v. Milton, 527 F.2d 730, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12519 (2d Cir. 1975)

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Brault v. Milton, 527 F.2d 730, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15947 (2d Cir. 1975)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
527 F.2d 730 p.742

Cited by:
Weeks v. United States, 216 F. 292, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1342, Am. Ann. Cas. 1917C524, L.R.A. (n.s.) 1915B651 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1914)
Cited by:
216 F. 292 p.301

2ND CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

Cited by:
Thompson v. New York, 487 F. Supp. 212, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8003 (N.D.N.Y 1979)
Cited by:
487 F. Supp. 212 p.219

Cited by:
Nieves v. United States, 280 F. Supp. 994, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8953 (S.D.N.Y. 1968)
Cited by:
280 F. Supp. 994 p.999

Cited by:
In re Bolton, 2 Ben. 189, 3 F. Cas. 820, F. Cas. No. 1614, 1868 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165, 1 N.B.R. 370 (1868)
Cited by:
3 F. Cas. 820 p.828

3RD CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
Minersville School Dist. v. Gobitis, 108 F.2d 683, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2627 (3d Cir. Pa. 1939)
Cited by:
108 F.2d 683 p.684

3RD CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

Cited by:
Bartee v. Yanoff, 514 F. Supp. 96, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12315 (E.D. Pa. 1981)
Cited by:
514 F. Supp. 96 p.98

Cited by:
United States ex rel. Hoss v. Cuyler, 452 F. Supp. 256, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18007 (E.D. Pa. 1978)
Cited by:
452 F. Supp. 256 p.281

Cited by:
Jones v. McElroy, 429 F. Supp. 848, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16650 (E.D. Pa. 1977)
Cited by:
429 F. Supp. 848 p.854

Cited by:
Winsby v. John Oster Mfg. Co., 336 F. Supp. 663, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15533, 16 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 118 (W.D. Pa. 1972)
Cited by:
336 F. Supp. 663 p.665

Questioned by:
CIO v. Hague, 25 F. Supp. 127, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1574, 3 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 740 (D.N.J. 1938)
Questioned by:
25 F. Supp. 127 p.131

Cited by:
United States v. Sprague, 44 F.2d 967, 1930 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1486 (D.N.J. 1930)
Cited by:
44 F.2d 967 p.974

4TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

Cited by:
Smith v. McDonald, 562 F. Supp. 829, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17348 (M.D.N.C. 1983)
Cited by:
562 F. Supp. 829 p.835

5TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
United States v. Emerson, 270 F.3d 203, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22386 (5th Cir. Tex. 2001)
Cited by:
270 F.3d 203 p.221

Cited by:
United States ex rel. Garibaldi v. Orleans Parish Sch. Bd., 244 F.3d 486, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 4976 (5th Cir. La. 2001)
Cited by:
244 F.3d 486 p.486

Cited by:
Hatten v. Rains, 854 F.2d 687, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12264, 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P38389, 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1617 (5th Cir. Tex. 1988)
Cited by:
854 F.2d 687 p.689

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Stern v. Tarrant County Hospital Dist., 778 F.2d 1052, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 25588 (5th Cir. Tex. 1985)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
778 F.2d 1052 p.1062

Cited by:
Hernandez v. Lafayette, 643 F.2d 1188, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 13680 (5th Cir. La. 1981)
Cited by:
643 F.2d 1188 p.1198

Cited by:
Screven County v. Brier Creek Hunting & Fishing Club, Inc., 202 F.2d 369, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3240 (5th Cir. Ga. 1953)
Cited by:
202 F.2d 369 p.371

5TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

Cited by:
United States v. Angleton, 221 F. Supp. 2d 696, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19469 (S.D. Tex. 2002)
Cited by:
221 F. Supp. 2d 696 p.706

Cited by:
Torries v. Hebert, 111 F. Supp. 2d 806, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18442 (W.D. La. 2000)
Cited by:
111 F. Supp. 2d 806 p.817

Cited by:
Gauglitz v. City of Dallas, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20366 (N.D. Tex. Dec. 15, 1997)

Cited by:
Melancon v. McKeithen, 345 F. Supp. 1025, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14862 (E.D. La. 1972)
Cited by:
345 F. Supp. 1025 p.1035

Cited by:
Rosen v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 318 F. Supp. 1217, 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10629 (D. La. 1970)
Cited by:
318 F. Supp. 1217 p.1229

Cited by:
United States v. One Ford Coupe, 3 F.2d 64, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1231 (D. La. 1924)
Cited by:
3 F.2d 64 p.65

Cited by:
Palestine Tel. Co. v. Palestine, 1 F.2d 349, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 959 (D. Tex. 1924)
Cited by:
1 F.2d 349 p.350

6TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
Penick v. Columbus Board of Education, 583 F.2d 787, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10144 (6th Cir. Ohio 1978)
Cited by:
583 F.2d 787 p.790

Cited by:
Gordon v. Warren, 579 F.2d 386, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10498 (6th Cir. 1978)
Cited by:
579 F.2d 386 p.389

6TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

Cited by:
Waller v. Tripett, 179 F. Supp. 2d 724, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23236 (E.D. Mich. 2001)
Cited by:
179 F. Supp. 2d 724 p.728

Cited by:
Malone v. Fayette County, 86 F. Supp. 2d 797, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2641 (W.D. Tenn. 2000)
Cited by:
86 F. Supp. 2d 797 p.803

Cited by:
Wynn v. Morgan, 861 F. Supp. 622, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16833 (E.D. Tenn. 1994)
Cited by:
861 F. Supp. 622 p.630

Cited by:
Ex parte Munn, 140 F. 782, 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118 (D. Ky. 1905)
Cited by:
140 F. 782 p.783

7TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
In re Chicago, M., S. P. & P. R. Co., 799 F.2d 317, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 28189, 123 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2184 (7th Cir. Ill. 1986)
Cited by:
799 F.2d 317 p.326

7TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

Cited by:
Thomas v. Drochner, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14237 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 17, 1992)

Cited by:
Beair v. County of Winnebago, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11984 (N.D. Ill. July 23, 1992)

Cited by:
Whitmore v. Board of Educ. of Dekalb Community Sch. Dist. No. 428, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4688, 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P41425 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 18, 1992)

Cited by:
Whitmore v. Board of Educ., 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P41425 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 18, 1992)
Cited by:
58 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P41425

Cited by:
Thomas v. Drochner, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6017 (N.D. Ill. May 17, 1990)

Cited by:
Lewis v. Russe, 713 F. Supp. 1227, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5795, 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40111 (N.D. Ill. 1989)
Cited by:
713 F. Supp. 1227 p.1230

Cited by:
Maze v. Fond du Lac, 643 F. Supp. 1108, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19998 (E.D. Wis. 1986)
Cited by:
643 F. Supp. 1108 p.1115

Cited by:
Chicago Teachers Union v. Board of Education, 569 F. Supp. 597, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14740, 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P34263, 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1318 (N.D. Ill. 1983)
Cited by:
569 F. Supp. 597 p.599

Cited by:
Rogers v. Provident Hospital, 241 F. Supp. 633, 1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6352 (N.D. Ill. 1965)
Cited by:
241 F. Supp. 633 p.635

8TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
Action v. Gannon, 450 F.2d 1227, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7301 (8th Cir. Mo. 1971)
Cited by:
450 F.2d 1227 p.1234

8TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

Cited by:
Ex parte Ulrich, 42 F. 587, 1890 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166 (D. Mo. 1890)
Cited by:
42 F. 587 p.589

9TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS

Questioned by:
Silveira v. Lockyer, 312 F.3d 1052, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24612, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 11711, 2002 D.A.R. 13739 (9th Cir. Cal. 2002)
Questioned by:
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24612

Cited by:
Schneider v. California Dep't of Corrections, 151 F.3d 1194, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 17712, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Service 6098, 98 D.A.R. 8471 (9th Cir. Cal. 1998)
Cited by:
151 F.3d 1194 p.1198

Cited by:
Johnston v. Earle, 245 F.2d 793, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5162, 52 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 388, 57-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9695 (9th Cir. Or. 1957)
Cited by:
245 F.2d 793 p.796

Cited by:
Denicke v. Brigham, 142 F.2d 221, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3296 (9th Cir. Cal. 1944)
Cited by:
142 F.2d 221 p.224

9TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

Cited by:
Bell v. Hood, 71 F. Supp. 813, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2600 (D. Cal. 1947)
Cited by:
71 F. Supp. 813 p.816

Cited by:
Ex parte Ceja, 52 F.2d 634, 1931 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1664 (D. Nev. 1931)
Cited by:
52 F.2d 634 p.635

Cited by:
Gibson v. Bellingham & N. R. Co., 213 F. 488, 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 968 (D. Wash. 1914)
Cited by:
213 F. 488 p.489

Cited by:
In the Matter of Atcherley, 3 Haw. Dist. 404 (D. Haw. 1909)
Cited by:
3 Haw. Dist. 404 p.412

Cited by:
In the Matter of the Application of Mankichi, 1 Haw. Dist. 303 (D. Haw. 1902)
Cited by:
1 Haw. Dist. 303 p.312

10TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
United States v. Hardman, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 17702 (10th Cir. Utah Aug. 8, 2001)
Cited by:
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 17702

Cited by:
Smith v. Kitchen, 156 F.3d 1025, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 35019, 1997 Colo. J. C.A.R. 3372, 98-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50107 (10th Cir. Colo. 1997)
Cited by:
156 F.3d 1025 p.1028

10TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

Cited by:
Edward v. Shanelec, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21175 (D. Kan. Aug. 12, 1998)
Cited by:
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21175

11TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

Cited by:
ABATE of Ga., Inc. v. Ga. , 137 F. Supp. 2d 1349, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4161 (N.D. Ga. 2001)
Cited by:
137 F. Supp. 2d 1349 p.1354

Cited by:
Dixon v. Gulley, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18136 (S.D. Ala. Oct. 19, 1998)
Cited by:
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18136

Cited by:
Roe v. Butterworth, 958 F. Supp. 1569, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3717, 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 603 (S.D. Fla. 1997)
Cited by:
958 F. Supp. 1569 p.1570

Cited by:
Johnson v. Cannon, 947 F. Supp. 1567, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17672 (M.D. Fla. 1996)
Cited by:
947 F. Supp. 1567 p.1572

Cited by:
Olsen v. Lane, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5258, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 135 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 11, 1994)

Criticized as stated in:
United States v. Gecas, 830 F. Supp. 1403, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11954 (N.D. Fla. 1993)

Cited by:
Jaffree v. Board of School Comm'rs, 554 F. Supp. 1104, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20009 (S.D. Ala. 1983)
Cited by:
554 F. Supp. 1104 p.1124
554 F. Supp. 1104 p.1125

D.C. CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
United States v. Ross, 210 U.S. App. D.C. 342, 655 F.2d 1159, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14764 (1981)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
655 F.2d 1159 p.1203

U.S. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Davis, 132 F. 629, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 5034 (C.C.D. Ark. 1904)
Cited by:
132 F. 629 p.632

Cited by:
Central of Georgia R. Co. v. Mayor, etc., of Macon, 110 F. 865, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4920 (C.C.D. Ga. 1901)
Cited by:
110 F. 865 p.870

Cited by:
King v. Hatfield, 130 F. 564, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4969 (C.C.D. W. Va. 1900)
Cited by:
130 F. 564 p.578

Cited by:
Cox v. Gilmer, 88 F. 343, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2795 (C.C.D. Va. 1898)
Cited by:
88 F. 343 p.349

Cited by:
Smith v. Bivens, 56 F. 352, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2680 (C.C.D.S.C. 1893)
Cited by:
56 F. 352 p.355

Cited by:
In re Boggs, 45 F. 475, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1781 (C.C.D. Ky. 1891)
Cited by:
45 F. 475 p.475

Cited by:
Kansas v. Bradley, 26 F. 289, 1885 U.S. App. LEXIS 2392 (C.C.D. Kan. 1885)
Cited by:
26 F. 289 p.290

Cited by:
United States v. Barnhart, 10 Sawy. 491, 22 F. 285, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 1917 (C.C.D. Or. 1884)
Cited by:
22 F. 285 p.290

Cited by:
The Head-Money Cases, 21 Blatchf. 460, 18 F. 135, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 1863 (C.C.D.N.Y. 1883)
Cited by:
18 F. 135 p.145

Cited by:
Lavin v. Emigrant Industrial Sav. Bank, 18 Blatchf. 1, 1 F. 641, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2028 (C.C.D.N.Y. 1880)
Cited by:
1 F. 641 p.652

Cited by:
Clark v. Kennedy Mfg. Co., 14 Blatchf. 79, 1877 U.S. App. LEXIS 1639, 5 F. Cas. 884, F. Cas. No. 2826, 1877 Dec. Comm'r Pat. 152, 2 Ban. & A. 479 (C.C.D. Conn. 1877)
Cited by:
5 F. Cas. 884 p.928

Cited by:
Anthony v. Carroll, 1875 U.S. App. LEXIS 1266, 1 F. Cas. 1048, F. Cas. No. 487, 1876 Dec. Comm'r Pat. 281, 2 Ban. & A. 195, 23 Pitts. Leg. J. 123 (1875)
Cited by:
1 F. Cas. 1048 p.1063

Cited by:
Philadelphia & R. R. Co. v. Morrison, 1864 U.S. App. LEXIS 317, 19 F. Cas. 487, F. Cas. No. 11089, 5 Phila. (Pa.) 515, 5 Phila. 515, 12 Pitts. Leg. J. 186 (1864)
Cited by:
19 F. Cas. 487 p.491

Cited by:
Griffing v. Gibb, 1 McAll. 212, 1857 U.S. App. LEXIS 587, 11 F. Cas. 33, F. Cas. No. 5819 (C.C.N.D. Cal. 1857)
Cited by:
11 F. Cas. 33 p.36

Cited by:
United States v. Hale, 4 Cranch C.C. 83, 1830 U.S. App. LEXIS 360, 26 F. Cas. 73, F. Cas. No. 15279, 4 D.C. 83 (1830)
Cited by:
26 F. Cas. 73 p.80

Cited by:
King v. Thompson, 3 Cranch C.C. 146, 1827 U.S. App. LEXIS 379, 14 F. Cas. 553, F. Cas. No. 7807, 3 D.C. 146 (1827)
Cited by:
14 F. Cas. 553 p.563

Cited by:
United States v. Read, 2 Cranch C.C. 198, 1820 U.S. App. LEXIS 259, 27 F. Cas. 716, F. Cas. No. 16126, 2 D.C. 198 (1820)
Cited by:
27 F. Cas. 716 p.790

U.S. COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

Cited by:
Transcom, Inc. v. United States, 121 F. Supp. 2d 690, 2000 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 150, Ct. Int'l Trade No. 2000-146, SLIP OP. 2000-146, 22 Int'l Trade Rep. (BNA) 2288 (2000)
Cited by:
121 F. Supp. 2d 690 p.707

OTHER FEDERAL DECISIONS

Cited by:
7 Op. Att'y Gen. 118
Cited by:
7 Op. Att'y Gen. 118 p.118

ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Ex parte Hill, 38 Ala. 458, 1863 Ala. LEXIS 7 (1863)
Cited by:
38 Ala. 458 p.501

Cited by:
Noles v. State, 24 Ala. 672, 1854 Ala. LEXIS 102 (1854)
Cited by:
24 Ala. 672 p.691

Cited by:
Boring v. Williams, 17 Ala. 510, 1850 Ala. LEXIS 81 (1850)
Cited by:
17 Ala. 510 p.516

ALABAMA COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
Banks v. State, 207 Ala. 179, 18 Ala. App. 376, 93 So. 293, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 279, 24 A.L.R. 1359 (1921)
Cited by:
207 Ala. 179 p.182
93 So. 293 p.300

ARIZONA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
State v. Thomas, 88 Ariz. 269, 356 P.2d 20, 1960 Ariz. LEXIS 227 (Ariz. 1960)
Cited by:
88 Ariz. 269 p.271
356 P.2d 20 p.21

Cited by:
Henderson v. State, 30 Ariz. 113, 244 P. 1020, 1926 Ariz. LEXIS 213 (Ariz. 1926)
Cited by:
30 Ariz. 113 p.116
244 P. 1020 p.1021

ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Johnson v. State, 214 Ark. 902, 218 S.W.2d 687, 1949 Ark. LEXIS 670 (Ark. 1949)
Cited by:
214 Ark. 902 p.908
218 S.W.2d 687 p.689

Cited by:
Cairo & F. R. R. Co. v. Turner, 31 Ark. 494, 1876 Ark. LEXIS 81, 25 Am. Rep. 564 (Ark. 1876)
Cited by:
31 Ark. 494 p.499

Cited by:
Fife v. State, 31 Ark. 455, 1876 Ark. LEXIS 69, 25 Am. Rep. 556 (Ark. 1876)
Cited by:
31 Ark. 455 p.458

Cited by:
Jacoway v. Denton, 25 Ark. 625, 1869 Ark. LEXIS 63 (Ark. 1869)
Cited by:
25 Ark. 625 p.666

CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Golden Gateway Center v. Golden Gateway Tenants Assn., 26 Cal. 4th 1013, 29 P.3d 797, 2001 Cal. LEXIS 5598, 111 Cal. Rptr. 2d 336, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Service 7627 (2001)
Cited by:
26 Cal. 4th 1013 p.1027
29 P.3d 797 p.806
111 Cal. Rptr. 2d 336 p.347

Cited by:
Price v. Superior Court, 25 Cal. 4th 1046, 25 P.3d 618, 2001 Cal. LEXIS 3794, 108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 409, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5296, 2001 D.A.R. 6415 (2001)
Cited by:
25 Cal. 4th 1046 p.1057
25 P.3d 618 p.624
108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 409 p.416

Cited by:
Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Lyons, 24 Cal. 4th 468, 12 P.3d 720, 2000 Cal. LEXIS 8927, 101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 470, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 9287, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 9526, 2000 D.A.R. 12507 (2000)
Cited by:
24 Cal. 4th 468 p.484
12 P.3d 720 p.730
101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 470 p.481

Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
People v. Peevy, 17 Cal. 4th 1184, 953 P.2d 1212, 1998 Cal. LEXIS 2623, 73 Cal. Rptr. 2d 865, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3444, 98 D.A.R. 4763 (1998)
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
17 Cal. 4th 1184 p.1209
953 P.2d 1212 p.1228
73 Cal. Rptr. 2d 865 p.881

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
People v. Monge, 16 Cal. 4th 826, 941 P.2d 1121, 1997 Cal. LEXIS 4980, 66 Cal. Rptr. 2d 853, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Service 6903, 97 D.A.R. 11199 (1997)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
16 Cal. 4th 826 p.873
941 P.2d 1121 p.1151
66 Cal. Rptr. 2d 853 p.883

Cited by:
Smith v. Fair Employment & Housing Com., 12 Cal. 4th 1143, 913 P.2d 909, 1996 Cal. LEXIS 1389, 51 Cal. Rptr. 2d 700, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2465, 96 D.A.R. 4067 (1996)
Cited by:
12 Cal. 4th 1143 p.1180
913 P.2d 909 p.932
51 Cal. Rptr. 2d 700 p.722

Cited by:
People v. Cahill, 5 Cal. 4th 478, 853 P.2d 1037, 1993 Cal. LEXIS 3087, 20 Cal. Rptr. 2d 582, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4902, 93 D.A.R. 8304 (1993)
Cited by:
5 Cal. 4th 478 p.514
853 P.2d 1037 p.1062
20 Cal. Rptr. 2d 582 p.607

Cited by:
Raven v. Deukmejian, 52 Cal. 3d 336, 801 P.2d 1077, 1990 Cal. LEXIS 5494, 276 Cal. Rptr. 326, 90 Cal. Daily Op. Service 9333, 90 D.A.R. 14642 (1990)
Cited by:
52 Cal. 3d 336 p.353
801 P.2d 1077 p.1088
276 Cal. Rptr. 326 p.337

Cited by:
Kruger v. Wells Fargo Bank, 11 Cal. 3d 352, 521 P.2d 441, 1974 Cal. LEXIS 302, 113 Cal. Rptr. 449, 65 A.L.R.3d 1266 (1974)
Cited by:
11 Cal. 3d 352 p.366
521 P.2d 441 p.450
113 Cal. Rptr. 449 p.458

Cited by:
Diamond v. Bland, 11 Cal. 3d 331, 521 P.2d 460, 1974 Cal. LEXIS 300, 113 Cal. Rptr. 468 (1974)
Cited by:
11 Cal. 3d 331 p.338
521 P.2d 460 p.465
113 Cal. Rptr. 468 p.473

Cited by:
People v. Cahan, 44 Cal. 2d 434, 282 P.2d 905, 1955 Cal. LEXIS 243, 50 A.L.R.2d 513 (1955)
Cited by:
44 Cal. 2d 434 p.438
282 P.2d 905 p.907

Cited by:
Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Eshleman, 166 Cal. 640, 137 P. 1119, 1913 Cal. LEXIS 373, Am. Ann. Cas. 1915C822, 50 L.R.A. (n.s.) 652 (1913)
Cited by:
166 Cal. 640 p.697
137 P. 1119 p.1141

CALIFORNIA COURTS OF APPEAL

Cited by:
Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers, 93 Cal. App. 3d 492, 1979 Cal. App. LEXIS 1786, 156 Cal. Rptr. 73 (Cal. App. 1st Dist. 1979)
Cited by:
93 Cal. App. 3d 492 p.515
156 Cal. Rptr. 73 p.87
156 Cal. Rptr. 73 p.88

Cited by:
People v. Watson, 57 Cal. App. 85, 206 P. 648, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 382 (Cal. App. 1922)
Cited by:
57 Cal. App. 85 p.87
206 P. 648 p.649

COLORADO SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Ryan v. People, 21 Colo. 119, 40 P. 775, 1895 Colo. LEXIS 156 (1895)
Cited by:
21 Colo. 119 p.122
40 P. 775 p.776

CONNECTICUT SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Tamm v. Burns, 222 Conn. 280, 610 A.2d 590, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 175 (1992)
Cited by:
222 Conn. 280 p.282
610 A.2d 590 p.592

Cited by:
State v. Gaetano, 96 Conn. 306, 114 A. 82, 1921 Conn. LEXIS 82, 15 A.L.R. 458 (1921)
Cited by:
96 Conn. 306 p.310
114 A. 82 p.83

Cited by:
Colt v. Eves, 12 Conn. 243, 1837 Conn. LEXIS 22 (1837)
Cited by:
12 Conn. 243 p.252

Cited by:
Hollister v. Union Co., 9 Conn. 436, 1833 Conn. LEXIS 39, 25 Am. Dec. 36 (1833)
Cited by:
9 Conn. 436 p.446

OTHER CONNECTICUT DECISIONS

Cited by:
Farmington River Co. v. Town Plan & Zoning Com., 25 Conn. Supp. 125, 197 A.2d 653, 1963 Conn. Super. LEXIS 174 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1963)
Cited by:
25 Conn. Supp. 125 p.134
197 A.2d 653 p.658

DELAWARE SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Dorsey v. State, 761 A.2d 807, 2000 Del. LEXIS 444 (Del. 2000)
Cited by:
761 A.2d 807 p.815

Cited by:
Johnson v. State, 711 A.2d 18, 1998 Del. LEXIS 209 (Del. 1998)
Cited by:
711 A.2d 18 p.22

Cited by:
Gannon v. State, 704 A.2d 272, 1998 Del. LEXIS 21 (Del. 1998)
Cited by:
704 A.2d 272 p.276

Cited by:
McCool v. Gehret, 657 A.2d 269, 1995 Del. LEXIS 163 (Del. 1995)
Cited by:
657 A.2d 269 p.281

Cited by:
Claudio v. State, 585 A.2d 1278, 1991 Del. LEXIS 30 (Del. 1991)
Cited by:
585 A.2d 1278 p.1287

Cited by:
Sanders v. State, 585 A.2d 117, 1990 Del. LEXIS 407 (Del. 1990)
Cited by:
585 A.2d 117 p.145

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
United States v. Carter, 121 So. 2d 433, 1960 Fla. LEXIS 2506 (Fla. 1960)
Cited by:
121 So. 2d 433 p.435

Cited by:
Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Committee, 108 So. 2d 729, 1958 Fla. LEXIS 1383 (Fla. 1958)
Cited by:
108 So. 2d 729 p.734

Cited by:
Demeter Land Co. v. Florida Public Service Co., 99 Fla. 954, 128 So. 402, 1930 Fla. LEXIS 1604 (1930)
Cited by:
99 Fla. 954 p.962
128 So. 402 p.406

GEORGIA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Johnson v. State, 152 Ga. 271, 109 S.E. 662, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 72, 19 A.L.R. 641 (1921)
Cited by:
152 Ga. 271 p.273
109 S.E. 662 p.662

Cited by:
Strickland v. State, 137 Ga. 1, 72 S.E. 260, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 271, Am. Ann. Cas. 1913B323, 36 L.R.A. (n.s.) 115 (1911)
Cited by:
137 Ga. 1 p.8
72 S.E. 260 p.263

Cited by:
Brantley v. State, 132 Ga. 573, 64 S.E. 676, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 363, 16 Am. Ann. Cas. (o.s.) 1203, 131 Am. St. Rep. 218, 22 L.R.A. (n.s.) 959 (1909)
Cited by:
132 Ga. 573 p.579
64 S.E. 676 p.679

Cited by:
Powers v. Inferior Court of Dougherty County, 23 Ga. 65, 1857 Ga. LEXIS 221 (1857)
Cited by:
23 Ga. 65 p.73

Cited by:
Campbell v. State, 11 Ga. 353, 1852 Ga. LEXIS 52 (1852)
Cited by:
11 Ga. 353 p.369

HAWAI'I SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Territory v. Scharsch, 25 Haw. 429, 1920 Haw. LEXIS 45 (Haw. 1920)
Cited by:
25 Haw. 429 p.431

Cited by:
Ex parte Edwards, 13 Haw. 32, 1900 Haw. LEXIS 9 (Haw. 1900)
Cited by:
13 Haw. 32 p.70

Cited by:
Republic of Hawaii v. Edwards, 11 Haw. 571, 1898 Haw. LEXIS 6 (Haw. 1898)
Cited by:
11 Haw. 571 p.578

IDAHO SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
State v. McClurg, 50 Idaho 762, 300 P. 898, 1931 Ida. LEXIS 79 (Idaho 1931)
Cited by:
50 Idaho 762 p.786
300 P. 898 p.907

ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
People v. Lobb, 17 Ill. 2d 287, 161 N.E.2d 325, 1959 Ill. LEXIS 341 (1959)
Cited by:
17 Ill. 2d 287 p.298
161 N.E.2d 325 p.331

Cited by:
People v. Elliott, 272 Ill. 592, 112 N.E. 300, 1916 Ill. LEXIS 2661, Am. Ann. Cas. 1918B391 (1916)
Cited by:
272 Ill. 592 p.598
112 N.E. 300 p.303

INDIANA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
State v. Swafford, 250 Ind. 541, 237 N.E.2d 580, 1968 Ind. LEXIS 685 (1968)
Cited by:
250 Ind. 541 p.546

Cited by:
Todd v. State, 226 Ind. 496, 81 N.E.2d 530, 81 N.E.2d 784, 82 N.E.2d 407, 1948 Ind. LEXIS 191 (1948)
Cited by:
226 Ind. 496 p.523
82 N.E.2d 407 p.409

Cited by:
Sinclair v. Gunzenhauser, 179 Ind. 78, 98 N.E. 37, 100 N.E. 376, 1912 Ind. LEXIS 150 (1912)
Cited by:
179 Ind. 78 p.110
98 N.E. 37 p.48

Cited by:
Barrett v. State, 175 Ind. 112, 93 N.E. 543, 1911 Ind. LEXIS 22 (1911)
Cited by:
175 Ind. 112 p.116
93 N.E. 543 p.544

Cited by:
Pittsburgh, C., C. & S. L. R. Co. v. Lightheiser, 168 Ind. 438, 78 N.E. 1033, 1906 Ind. LEXIS 171 (1906)
Cited by:
168 Ind. 438 p.462
78 N.E. 1033 p.1041

Cited by:
Spurgeon v. Rhodes, 167 Ind. 1, 78 N.E. 228, 1906 Ind. LEXIS 1 (1906)
Cited by:
167 Ind. 1 p.11
78 N.E. 228 p.231

Cited by:
State v. Comer, 157 Ind. 611, 62 N.E. 452, 1902 Ind. LEXIS 205 (1902)
Cited by:
157 Ind. 611 p.613
62 N.E. 452 p.453

Cited by:
State v. Boswell, 104 Ind. 541, 4 N.E. 675, 1886 Ind. LEXIS 16 (1886)
Cited by:
104 Ind. 541 p.542
4 N.E. 675 p.676

Cited by:
Butler v. State, 97 Ind. 378, 1884 Ind. LEXIS 444 (1884)
Cited by:
97 Ind. 378 p.382

Cited by:
Cory v. Carter, 48 Ind. 327, 17 Am. Rep. 738 (1874)
Cited by:
48 Ind. 327 p.346

Cited by:
Griffin v. Wilcox, 21 Ind. 370, 1863 Ind. LEXIS 327 (1863)
Cited by:
21 Ind. 370 p.384

Cited by:
Lake Erie, W. & S. L. R. Co. v. Heath, 9 Ind. 530, 9 Ind. 558, 1857 Ind. LEXIS 667 (1857)
Cited by:
9 Ind. 558 p.559

Cited by:
Herman v. State, 8 Ind. 490, 8 Ind. 545, 1855 Ind. LEXIS 520 (1857)
Cited by:
8 Ind. 545 p.552

IOWA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
State v. Collins, 260 Iowa 1366, 152 N.W.2d 612, 1967 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 857 (1967)
Cited by:
260 Iowa 1366 p.1370
152 N.W.2d 612 p.615

Cited by:
State v. Ostby, 212 N.W. 550 (Iowa 1927)
Cited by:
212 N.W. 550 p.550

Cited by:
State v. Ostby, 203 Iowa 333, 210 N.W. 934, 1927 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 66 (1926)
Cited by:
203 Iowa 333 p.337

Cited by:
Olander v. Hollowell, 193 Iowa 979, 188 N.W. 667, 1922 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 210 (1922)
Cited by:
193 Iowa 979 p.984
188 N.W. 667 p.669

Cited by:
Simpson v. Board of Sup'rs, 180 Iowa 1330, 162 N.W. 824, 1917 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 160 (1917)
Cited by:
180 Iowa 1330 p.1338
162 N.W. 824 p.827

Cited by:
Gano v. Minneapolis & S. L. R. Co., 114 Iowa 713, 87 N.W. 714, 1901 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 485, 89 Am. St. Rep. 393, 55 L.R.A. 263 (1901)
Cited by:
114 Iowa 713 p.722
87 N.W. 714 p.717

Cited by:
State v. Parker, 66 Iowa 586, 24 N.W. 225, 1885 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 150 (1885)
Cited by:
66 Iowa 586 p.588
24 N.W. 225 p.226

Cited by:
State v. Wells, 46 Iowa 662, 1877 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 167 (1877)
Cited by:
46 Iowa 662 p.663

Cited by:
Boyd v. Ellis, 11 Iowa 97, 1860 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 156 (1860)
Cited by:
11 Iowa 97 p.99

KANSAS SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Bailey v. Hudspeth, 164 Kan. 600, 191 P.2d 894, 1948 Kan. LEXIS 258 (1948)
Cited by:
164 Kan. 600 p.603
191 P.2d 894 p.897

Cited by:
State ex rel. Smith v. Kansas City, 125 Kan. 88, 262 P. 1032, 1928 Kan. LEXIS 278 (1928)
Cited by:
125 Kan. 88 p.90
262 P. 1032 p.1034

Cited by:
State v. Newton, 74 Kan. 561, 87 P. 757, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 103 (1906)
Cited by:
74 Kan. 561 p.563
87 P. 757 p.757

Cited by:
State v. Majors, 16 Kan. 440, 1876 Kan. LEXIS 70 (1876)
Cited by:
16 Kan. 440 p.444

Cited by:
State v. Barnett, 3 Kan. 250, 1865 Kan. LEXIS 19, 87 Am. Dec. 471 (1865)
Cited by:
3 Kan. 250 p.253

KENTUCKY SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Hall v. Commonwealth, 197 Ky. 179, 246 S.W. 441, 1923 Ky. LEXIS 593 (1923)
Cited by:
197 Ky. 179 p.184
246 S.W. 441 p.443

Cited by:
Manning v. Roberts, 179 Ky. 550, 200 S.W. 937, 1918 Ky. LEXIS 248 (1918)
Cited by:
179 Ky. 550 p.554
200 S.W. 937 p.938

LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
State v. Beer, 252 La. 756, 214 So. 2d 133, 1968 La. LEXIS 2793 (1968)
Cited by:
252 La. 756 p.764
214 So. 2d 133 p.136

Cited by:
State v. Dominguez, 228 La. 284, 82 So. 2d 12, 1955 La. LEXIS 1364 (1955)
Cited by:
228 La. 284 p.314
82 So. 2d 12 p.22

Cited by:
State v. Thomas, 224 La. 431, 69 So. 2d 738, 1953 La. LEXIS 1448 (1953)
Cited by:
224 La. 431 p.435
69 So. 2d 738 p.740

Cited by:
State v. Jackson, 21 La. Ann. 574, 1869 La. LEXIS 327 (1869)
Cited by:
21 La. Ann. 574 p.575

LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
Whatley v. Love, 13 So. 2d 719, 1943 La. App. LEXIS 334 (La.App., Orleans 1943)
Cited by:
13 So. 2d 719 p.723

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT

Cited by:
In re Stanley, 133 Me. 91, 174 A. 93, 1934 Me. LEXIS 54 (1934)
Cited by:
133 Me. 91 p.94
174 A. 93 p.95

MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
Slansky v. State, 192 Md. 94, 63 A.2d 599, 1949 Md. LEXIS 219 (1949)
Cited by:
192 Md. 94 p.105
63 A.2d 599 p.604

Cited by:
Robb v. State, 190 Md. 641, 60 A.2d 211, 1948 Md. LEXIS 316 (1948)
Cited by:
190 Md. 641 p.648
60 A.2d 211 p.214

Cited by:
Price v. State, 160 Md. 670, 154 A. 556, 1931 Md. LEXIS 120 (1931)
Cited by:
160 Md. 670 p.672
154 A. 556 p.557

Cited by:
Cumberland v. Willison, 50 Md. 138, 1878 Md. LEXIS 148, 33 Am. Rep. 304 (1878)
Cited by:
50 Md. 138 p.151

MASSACHUSETTS

Cited by:
8 Gray 1
Cited by:
8 Gray 1 p.346

Cited by:
5 Gray 1
Cited by:
5 Gray 1 p.485

MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
People v. Simon, 324 Mich. 450, 36 N.W.2d 734, 1949 Mich. LEXIS 450 (1949)
Cited by:
324 Mich. 450 p.452
36 N.W.2d 734 p.735

Cited by:
People v. Harwood, 286 Mich. 96, 281 N.W. 551, 1938 Mich. LEXIS 659 (1938)
Cited by:
286 Mich. 96 p.98
281 N.W. 551 p.552

Cited by:
Loomis v. Hartz, 165 Mich. 662, 131 N.W. 85, 1911 Mich. LEXIS 863 (1911)
Cited by:
165 Mich. 662 p.665
131 N.W. 85 p.86

Cited by:
Weimer v. Bunbury, 30 Mich. 201, 1874 Mich. LEXIS 168 (1874)
Cited by:
30 Mich. 201 p.208

Cited by:
Crane v. Reeder, 28 Mich. 527, 1874 Mich. LEXIS 27, 15 Am. Rep. 223 (1874)
Cited by:
28 Mich. 527 p.533

Cited by:
People ex rel. Trombley v. Humphrey, 23 Mich. 471, McGrath No. 1045, 1871 Mich. LEXIS 123, 9 Am. Rep. 94 (1871)
Cited by:
23 Mich. 471 p.482

MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Martin v. Dix, 52 Miss. 53, 1876 Miss. LEXIS 163, 24 Am. Rep. 661 (1876)
Cited by:
52 Miss. 53 p.58

MISSOURI SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Webster Groves v. Quick, 319 S.W.2d 543, 1959 Mo. LEXIS 932 (Mo. 1959)
Cited by:
319 S.W.2d 543 p.545

Cited by:
State v. Rebasti, 306 Mo. 336, 267 S.W. 858, 1924 Mo. LEXIS 577 (1924)
Cited by:
306 Mo. 336 p.351
267 S.W. 858 p.862

Cited by:
Ex parte McLaughlin, 210 Mo. 657, 109 S.W. 626, 1908 Mo. LEXIS 80 (1908)
Cited by:
210 Mo. 657 p.662
109 S.W. 626 p.626

Cited by:
State v. Rudolph, 187 Mo. 67, 85 S.W. 584, 1905 Mo. LEXIS 248 (1905)
Cited by:
187 Mo. 67 p.82
85 S.W. 584 p.587

Cited by:
St. Louis v. Richeson, 76 Mo. 470, 1882 Mo. LEXIS 229 (1882)
Cited by:
76 Mo. 470 p.478

Cited by:
Clark v. Mitchell, 64 Mo. 564, 1877 Mo. LEXIS 284 (1877)
Cited by:
64 Mo. 564 p.572

Cited by:
North M. R. Co. v. Maguire, 49 Mo. 490, 1872 Mo. LEXIS 104, 8 Am. Rep. 141 (1872)
Cited by:
49 Mo. 490 p.495

Cited by:
State v. Schricker, 29 Mo. 265, 1860 Mo. LEXIS 7 (1860)
Cited by:
29 Mo. 265 p.266

MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
Ex parte Snyder, 29 Mo. App. 256, 1888 Mo. App. LEXIS 78 (1888)
Cited by:
29 Mo. App. 256 p.264

Cited by:
State v. Kaub, 19 Mo. App. 149, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 195 (1885)
Cited by:
19 Mo. App. 149 p.150

MONTANA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Boepple v. Mohalt, 101 Mont. 417, 54 P.2d 857, 1936 Mont. LEXIS 17 (Mont. 1936)
Cited by:
101 Mont. 417 p.440
54 P.2d 857 p.864

Cited by:
State ex rel. Samlin v. District Court, 59 Mont. 600, 198 P. 362, 1921 Mont. LEXIS 237 (Mont. 1921)
Cited by:
59 Mont. 600 p.606
198 P. 362 p.364

Cited by:
Ex parte McDonald, 49 Mont. 454, 143 P. 947, 1914 Mont. LEXIS 80, Am. Ann. Cas. 1916A1166, L.R.A. (n.s.) 1915B988 (Mont. 1914)
Cited by:
49 Mont. 454 p.473
143 P. 947 p.953

NEBRASKA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Bohanan v. State, 18 Neb. 57, 24 N.W. 390, 1885 Neb. LEXIS 5, 53 Am. Rep. 791 (1885)
Cited by:
18 Neb. 57 p.77
24 N.W. 390 p.399

NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Eaton v. B. C. & M. R.R., 51 N.H. 504, 1872 N.H. LEXIS 75, 12 Am. Rep. 147 (1872)
Cited by:
51 N.H. 504 p.522

NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
State v. Miller, 71 N.J.L. 527, 60 A. 202, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 140 (N.J. 1905)
Cited by:
71 N.J.L. 527 p.532
60 A. 202 p.203

Cited by:
Sinnickson v. Johnson, 17 N.J.L. 129, 1839 N.J. LEXIS 14, 34 Am. Dec. 184 (N.J. 1839)
Cited by:
17 N.J.L. 129 p.146

NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT

Cited by:
State v. MacQueen, 69 N.J.L. 522, 55 A. 1006, 1903 N.J. Super. LEXIS 451 (N.J. Super. Ct. 1903)
Cited by:
69 N.J.L. 522 p.527
55 A. 1006 p.1008

NEW MEXICO SUPREME COURT

Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
State v. Cardenas-Alvarez, 2001 NMSC 17, 130 N.M. 386, 25 P.3d 225, 2001 N.M. LEXIS 175, 40 N.M. B. Bull. 23, 40 N.M. B. Bull. No. 23 22 (2001)
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
2001 NMSC 17
130 N.M. 386 p.396
25 P.3d 225 p.235

NEW MEXICO COURT OF APPEALS

Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
State v. Snyder, 1998 NMCA 166, 126 N.M. 168, 967 P.2d 843, 1998 N.M. App. LEXIS 146, 37 N.M. B. Bull. 49, 37 N.M. B. Bull. No. 49 30 (1998)
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
1998 NMCA 166
126 N.M. 168 p.175
967 P.2d 843 p.850
37 N.M. B. Bull. No. 49 30 p.34

NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
Sharrock v. Dell Buick-Cadillac, Inc., 45 N.Y.2d 152, 379 N.E.2d 1169, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2106, 408 N.Y.S.2d 39 (1978)
Cited by:
45 N.Y.2d 152 p.160
379 N.E.2d 1169 p.1174
408 N.Y.S.2d 39 p.44

Cited by:
Landes v. Landes, 1 N.Y.2d 358, 135 N.E.2d 562, 1956 N.Y. LEXIS 852, 153 N.Y.S.2d 14 (1956)
Cited by:
1 N.Y.2d 358 p.365
135 N.E.2d 562 p.566
153 N.Y.S.2d 14 p.19

Cited by:
People ex rel. Lewisohn v. O'Brien, 176 N.Y. 253, 176 N.Y. (N.Y.S.) 253, 68 N.E. 353, 1903 N.Y. LEXIS 798 (1903)
Cited by:
176 N.Y. 253 p.261
68 N.E. 353 p.354

Cited by:
Eldridge v. Binghamton, 120 N.Y. 309, 120 N.Y. (N.Y.S.) 309, 24 N.E. 462, 1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1263 (1890)
Cited by:
120 N.Y. 309 p.313
24 N.E. 462 p.463

Cited by:
People v. Penhollow, 42 Hun 103, 5 N.Y. Cr. 41, 3 N.Y. St. 445 (N.Y. 1886)
Cited by:
42 Hun 103 p.106
5 N.Y. Cr. 41 p.43

Cited by:
Phelps v. People, 72 N.Y. 334, 72 N.Y. (N.Y.S.) 334, 1878 N.Y. LEXIS 516, 2 Cow. Cr. 383 (1878)
Cited by:
2 Cow. Cr. 383 p.409

NEW YORK SUPREME COURT APP. DIV.

Cited by:
People v. Jelke, 284 A.D. 211, 130 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Cited by:
284 A.D. 211 p.221
130 N.Y.S.2d 662 p.672

Cited by:
In re Graham, 203 A.D. 172, 196 N.Y.S. 276, 1922 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7156, 40 N.Y. Cr. 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
Cited by:
203 A.D. 172 p.173
196 N.Y.S. 276 p.277

Cited by:
People ex rel. Darling v. Warden of City Prison, 154 A.D. 413, 139 N.Y.S. 277, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9036, 29 N.Y. Cr. 66 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Cited by:
154 A.D. 413 p.419
139 N.Y.S. 277 p.283

Cited by:
Pratt Institute v. New York, 99 A.D. 525, 91 N.Y.S. 136, 1904 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3112 (N.Y. App. Div. 1904)
Cited by:
99 A.D. 525 p.526
91 N.Y.S. 136 p.138

NEW YORK

Cited by:
TAYLOR v. PORTER & FORD, 4 Hill 140, 1843 N.Y. LEXIS 16, 40 Am. Dec. 274 (1843)
Cited by:
4 Hill 140 p.149

Cited by:
11 Barb. 26
Cited by:
11 Barb. 26 p.30

OTHER NEW YORK DECISIONS

Cited by:
Doe v. Daily News, L.P., 173 Misc. 2d 321, 660 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1997 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 266 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1997)
Cited by:
173 Misc. 2d 321 p.328
660 N.Y.S.2d 604 p.609

Cited by:
Engel v. Vitale, 18 Misc. 2d 659, 191 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3126 (1959)
Cited by:
18 Misc. 2d 659 p.678
191 N.Y.S.2d 453 p.475

Cited by:
People v. Milone, 119 Misc. 22, 195 N.Y.S. 488, 1922 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1398 (N.Y. County Ct. 1922)
Cited by:
119 Misc. 22 p.23
195 N.Y.S. 488 p.489

Cited by:
People ex rel. Kemmler v. Durston, 7 N.Y.S. 813, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1318, 55 Hun 64, 7 N.Y. Cr. 364 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1889)
Cited by:
55 Hun 64 p.68
7 N.Y. Cr. 364 p.368
7 N.Y.S. 813 p.815

NORTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Hall v. Post, 323 N.C. 259, 372 S.E.2d 711, 1988 N.C. LEXIS 611, 15 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2329 (1988)
Cited by:
323 N.C. 259 p.262
372 S.E.2d 711 p.713

Cited by:
State v. Jones, 304 N.C. 323, 283 S.E.2d 483, 1981 N.C. LEXIS 1342 (1981)
Cited by:
304 N.C. 323 p.327
283 S.E.2d 483 p.486

Cited by:
State v. Lee, 247 N.C. 230, 100 S.E.2d 372, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 657 (1957)
Cited by:
247 N.C. 230 p.231
100 S.E.2d 372 p.373

Cited by:
State v. Campbell, 182 N.C. 911, 110 S.E. 86, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 364 (1921)
Cited by:
182 N.C. 911 p.913
110 S.E. 86 p.87

Cited by:
In re Briggs, 135 N.C. 118, 47 S.E. 403, 1904 N.C. LEXIS 16 (1904)
Cited by:
135 N.C. 118 p.120
47 S.E. 403 p.404

Cited by:
State v. Patterson, 134 N.C. 612, 47 S.E. 808, 1904 N.C. LEXIS 136 (1904)
Cited by:
134 N.C. 612 p.618
47 S.E. 808 p.810

Cited by:
State v. Caldwell, 115 N.C. 794, 20 S.E. 523, 1894 N.C. LEXIS 318 (1894)
Cited by:
115 N.C. 794 p.803
20 S.E. 523 p.526

Cited by:
State v. Wilson, 107 N.C. 865, 12 S.E. 320, 1890 N.C. LEXIS 162 (1890)
Cited by:
107 N.C. 865 p.870
12 S.E. 320 p.323

Cited by:
State v. Glen, 52 N.C. 321, 7 Jones Law 321, 1859 N.C. LEXIS 97 (1859)
Cited by:
52 N.C. 321 p.331

Cited by:
State v. Newsom, 27 N.C. 250, 5 Ired. Law 250, 1844 N.C. LEXIS 119 (1844)
Cited by:
27 N.C. 250 p.251

Cited by:
Raleigh & G. R. Co. v. Davis, 19 N.C. 451, 2 Dev. & Bat. Law 451, 1837 N.C. LEXIS 56 (1837)
Cited by:
19 N.C. 451 p.459

NORTH DAKOTA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Klein v. Hutton, 49 N.D. 248, 191 N.W. 485, 1922 N.D. LEXIS 48 (N.D. 1922)
Cited by:
49 N.D. 248 p.258
191 N.W. 485 p.489

Cited by:
McHenry County v. Brady, 37 N.D. 59, 163 N.W. 540, 1917 N.D. LEXIS 78 (N.D. 1917)
Cited by:
37 N.D. 59 p.76
163 N.W. 540 p.546

OHIO SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Stockum v. State, 106 Ohio St. 249, 1 Ohio Law Abs. 70, 1 Ohio Law Abs. 72, 139 N.E. 855, 1922 Ohio LEXIS 242, 20 Ohio L. Rep. 470, 20 Ohio L. Rep. 471 (1922)
Cited by:
106 Ohio St. 249 p.250
139 N.E. 855 p.855

Cited by:
Burke v. State, 104 Ohio St. 220, 135 N.E. 644, 1922 Ohio LEXIS 371, 19 Ohio L. Rep. 663, 19 Ohio L. Rep. 665 (1922)
Cited by:
104 Ohio St. 220 p.226
135 N.E. 644 p.645

Cited by:
Bank of Toledo v. Toledo, 1 Ohio St. 622, 1853 Ohio LEXIS 289 (1853)
Cited by:
1 Ohio St. 622 p.687

OTHER OHIO DECISIONS

Cited by:
State v. Senzarino, 10 Ohio Misc. 241, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 383, 224 N.E.2d 389, 1967 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 342 (Ohio C.P. 1967)
Cited by:
224 N.E.2d 389 p.393

Cited by:
State v. Arnold, 69 Ohio Law Abs. 148, 124 N.E.2d 473, 1954 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 337 (Ohio C.P. 1954)
Cited by:
124 N.E.2d 473 p.475

OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Ex parte McNaught, 1909 OK 37, 23 Okla. 285, 1 Okla. Crim. 260, 100 P. 27, 1909 Okla. LEXIS 349 (1909)
Cited by:
23 Okla. 285 p.300
1 Okla. Crim. 260 p.274
100 P. 27 p.32

Cited by:
Territory v. Stroud, 6 Okla. 106, 50 P. 265, 1897 Okla. LEXIS 7 (1897)
Cited by:
6 Okla. 106 p.111
50 P. 265 p.267

OKLAHOMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Cited by:
Scribner v. State, 9 Okla. Crim. 465, 132 P. 933, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 192, Am. Ann. Cas. 1915B381 (1913)
Cited by:
9 Okla. Crim. 465 p.476
132 P. 933 p.937

Cited by:
Anderson v. State, 8 Okla. Crim. 90, 126 P. 840, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 401, Am. Ann. Cas. 1914C314 (1912)
Cited by:
8 Okla. Crim. 90 p.109
126 P. 840 p.848

Cited by:
Ex parte Simmons, 5 Okla. Crim. 399, 115 P. 380, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 175 (1911)
Cited by:
5 Okla. Crim. 399 p.438
115 P. 380 p.396

OREGON COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
State v. Flores, 68 Or. App. 617, 685 P.2d 999, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3385 (1984)
Cited by:
68 Or. App. 617 p.619
685 P.2d 999 p.1001

PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Commonwealth v. Nelson, 377 Pa. 58, 104 A.2d 133, 1954 Pa. LEXIS 497 (1954)
Cited by:
377 Pa. 58 p.103
104 A.2d 133 p.155

Cited by:
Commonwealth ex rel. McGlinn v. Smith, 344 Pa. 41, 24 A.2d 1, 1942 Pa. LEXIS 332 (1942)
Cited by:
344 Pa. 41 p.45
24 A.2d 1 p.3

Cited by:
New York & Pennsylvania Co. v. New York C. R. Co., 267 Pa. 64, 110 A. 286, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 811 (1920)
Cited by:
267 Pa. 64 p.78
110 A. 286 p.291

Cited by:
Green v. Reading, 9 Watts 382, 1840 Pa. LEXIS 40, 36 Am. Dec. 127 (Pa. 1840)
Cited by:
9 Watts 382 p.386

PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT

Cited by:
Commonwealth v. Boerner, 281 Pa. Super. 505, 422 A.2d 583, 1980 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3171 (1980)
Cited by:
281 Pa. Super. 505 p.515
422 A.2d 583 p.588

OTHER PENNSYLVANIA DECISIONS

Cited by:
Commonwealth v. Watson, 16 Pa. D. & C.2d 190, 1958 Pa. D. & C. LEXIS 23, 9 Cumberland L. J. 122 (1958)

Cited by:
Commonwealth v. Schwalm, 71 Pa. D. & C. 113, 1949 Pa. D. & C. LEXIS 344 (1949)

RHODE ISLAND SUPREME COURT

Criticized as stated in:
Bendick v. Cambio, 558 A.2d 941, 1989 R.I. LEXIS 82 (R.I. 1989)

Cited by:
In re Advisory Opinion (Chief Justice), 507 A.2d 1316, 1986 R.I. LEXIS 475 (R.I. 1986)
Cited by:
507 A.2d 1316 p.1327

Cited by:
Joslin Mfg. Co. v. Clarke, 44 R.I. 31, 114 A. 185, 1921 R.I. LEXIS 43 (1921)
Cited by:
44 R.I. 31 p.33
114 A. 185 p.185

Cited by:
East Shore Land Co. v. Peckham, 33 R.I. 541, 82 A. 487, 1912 R.I. LEXIS 117 (1912)
Cited by:
33 R.I. 541 p.544
82 A. 487 p.489

Cited by:
State v. Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co., 18 R.I. 16, 25 A. 246, 1892 R.I. LEXIS 1, 17 L.R.A. 856 (1892)
Cited by:
18 R.I. 16 p.20
25 A. 246 p.248

Cited by:
State v. Fitzpatrick, 16 R.I. 60, 11 A. 773, 1888 R.I. LEXIS 4 (1887)
Cited by:
16 R.I. 60 p.63
11 A. 773 p.775

Cited by:
State v. Flynn, 16 R.I. 10, 11 A. 170, 1887 R.I. LEXIS 68 (1887)
Cited by:
16 R.I. 10 p.11
11 A. 170 p.171

Cited by:
State v. Paul, 5 R.I. 185, 1858 R.I. LEXIS 12 (1858)
Cited by:
5 R.I. 185 p.196

SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Riley v. Charleston Union Station Co., 71 S.C. 457, 51 S.E. 485, 1905 S.C. LEXIS 74, 110 Am. St. Rep. 579 (S.C. 1905)
Cited by:
71 S.C. 457 p.483
51 S.E. 485 p.495

Cited by:
State ex rel. George v. City Council of Aiken, 42 S.C. 222, 20 S.E. 221, 1894 S.C. LEXIS 3, 26 L.R.A. 345 (S.C. 1894)
Cited by:
42 S.C. 222 p.248
20 S.E. 221 p.231

Cited by:
State v. Shumpert, 1 S.C. 85, 1869 S.C. LEXIS 5 (S.C. 1869)
Cited by:
1 S.C. 85 p.86

OTHER SOUTH CAROLINA DECISIONS

Cited by:
State v. Starling, 49 S.C.L. 120, 15 Rich. 120 (1867)
Cited by:
49 S.C.L. 120 p.128

SOUTH DAKOTA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
State v. Brennan, 2 S.D. 384, 50 N.W. 625, 1891 S.D. LEXIS 38 (1891)
Cited by:
2 S.D. 384 p.388
50 N.W. 625 p.625

TENNESSEE SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n v. Haston, 153 Tenn. 675, 284 S.W. 905, 1925 Tenn. LEXIS 53, 26 Thompson 675 (1926)
Cited by:
153 Tenn. 675 p.687
284 S.W. 905 p.908

Cited by:
State v. Rhodes, 146 Tenn. 398, 242 S.W. 642, 1922 Tenn. LEXIS 5, 19 Thompson 398, 22 A.L.R. 1544 (1922)
Cited by:
146 Tenn. 398 p.405
242 S.W. 642 p.644

Cited by:
Smith v. Tate, 143 Tenn. 268, 227 S.W. 1026, 1920 Tenn. LEXIS 17, 16 Thompson 268 (1921)
Cited by:
143 Tenn. 268 p.274
227 S.W. 1026 p.1028

Cited by:
Raine v. State, 143 Tenn. 168, 226 S.W. 189, 1920 Tenn. LEXIS 6, 16 Thompson 168 (1920)
Cited by:
143 Tenn. 168 p.176
226 S.W. 189 p.192

Cited by:
State v. Norvell, 137 Tenn. 82, 191 S.W. 536, 1916 Tenn. LEXIS 55, 10 Thompson 82, L.R.A. (n.s.) 1917D586 (1916)
Cited by:
137 Tenn. 82 p.95
191 S.W. 536 p.539

Cited by:
Greenwood v. State, 65 Tenn. 567, 6 Baxt. 567, 1 Shan. 264, 1873 Tenn. LEXIS 410, 32 Am. Rep. 539 (1873)
Cited by:
65 Tenn. 567 p.568

Cited by:
Frierson v. General Assembly of Presbyterian Church, 54 Tenn. 683, 7 Heisk. 683, 1872 Tenn. LEXIS 106 (1872)
Cited by:
54 Tenn. 683 p.703

Cited by:
Andrews v. State, 50 Tenn. 165, 3 Heisk. 165, 1871 Tenn. LEXIS 83, 8 Am. Rep. 8 (1871)
Cited by:
50 Tenn. 165 p.172

Cited by:
State v. Rankin, 44 Tenn. 145, 4 Cold. 145, 1867 Tenn. LEXIS 24 (1867)
Cited by:
44 Tenn. 145 p.153

Cited by:
Woodfolk v. Nashville & C. R. Co., 32 Tenn. 422, 2 Swan 422, 1852 Tenn. LEXIS 94 (1852)
Cited by:
32 Tenn. 422 p.431

TEXAS SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
LeCroy v. Hanlon, 713 S.W.2d 335, 1986 Tex. LEXIS 562, 29 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 490 (Tex. 1986)
Cited by:
713 S.W.2d 335 p.338

Cited by:
State v. Duke, 42 Tex. 455, 1874 Tex. LEXIS 352 (Tex. 1875)
Cited by:
42 Tex. 455 p.457

TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Cited by:
Johnson v. State, 912 S.W.2d 227, 1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995)
Cited by:
1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 115

Cited by:
Johnson v. State, 912 S.W.2d 227 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995)
Cited by:
912 S.W.2d 227 p.233

Cited by:
Autran v. State, 887 S.W.2d 31, 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 101 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994)
Cited by:
887 S.W.2d 31 p.39

Cited by:
Eisenhauer v. State, 754 S.W.2d 159, 1988 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 53, 56 U.S.L.W. 2602 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988)
Cited by:
754 S.W.2d 159 p.168

Cited by:
Brown v. State, 657 S.W.2d 797, 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1136 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983)
Cited by:
657 S.W.2d 797 p.808

Cited by:
Mischer v. State, 41 Tex. Crim. 212, 53 S.W. 627, 1899 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 170, 96 Am. St. Rep. 780 (Tex. Crim. App. 1899)
Cited by:
41 Tex. Crim. 212 p.220
53 S.W. 627 p.627

Cited by:
Cox v. State, 8 Tex. Ct. App. 254, 1880 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 79, 34 Am. Rep. 746 (Tex. Crim. App. 1880)
Cited by:
8 Tex. Ct. App. 254 p.285

TEXAS COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

Cited by:
Martin v. Johnson, 11 Tex. Civ. App. 628, 33 S.W. 306, 1895 Tex. App. LEXIS 328 (Tex. Civ. App. Dallas 1895)
Cited by:
11 Tex. Civ. App. 628 p.634
33 S.W. 306 p.308

UTAH SUPREME COURT

Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
State v. Anderson, 910 P.2d 1229, 1996 Utah LEXIS 31, 283 Utah Adv. 12 (Utah 1996)
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
910 P.2d 1229 p.1240

Cited by:
In re McKee, 19 Utah 231, 57 P. 23, 1899 Utah LEXIS 90 (1899)
Cited by:
19 Utah 231 p.235
57 P. 23 p.24

VERMONT SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
In re Blake, 107 Vt. 18, 175 A. 252, 1934 Vt. LEXIS 137 (1934)
Cited by:
107 Vt. 18 p.23
175 A. 252 p.254

Cited by:
State v. Hodgson, 66 Vt. 134, 28 A. 1089, 1893 Vt. LEXIS 23 (1894)
Cited by:
66 Vt. 134 p.156
28 A. 1089 p.1095

Cited by:
Lincoln v. Smith, 27 Vt. 328, 1855 Vt. LEXIS 40 (1855)
Cited by:
27 Vt. 328 p.336

VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Hall v. Commonwealth, 138 Va. 727, 121 S.E. 154, 1924 Va. LEXIS 65 (1924)
Cited by:
138 Va. 727 p.748
121 S.E. 154 p.160

Cited by:
Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. Carnahan, 118 Va. 46, 86 S.E. 863, 1915 Va. LEXIS 122 (1915)
Cited by:
118 Va. 46 p.54
86 S.E. 863 p.866

Cited by:
Miller v. Commonwealth, 88 Va. 618, 14 S.E. 161, 1892 Va. LEXIS 13, 15 L.R.A. 441 (1891)
Cited by:
88 Va. 618 p.623
14 S.E. 161 p.163

Cited by:
Commonwealth v. Byrne, 61 Va. 165, 20 Gratt. 165, 1871 Va. LEXIS 1 (1871)
Cited by:
61 Va. 165 p.186

WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
State v. Thorne, 129 Wn.2d 736, 921 P.2d 514, 1996 Wash. LEXIS 472 (1996)
Cited by:
129 Wn.2d 736 p.786
921 P.2d 514 p.538

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
State v. Manussier, 129 Wn.2d 652, 921 P.2d 473, 1996 Wash. LEXIS 476 (1996)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
129 Wn.2d 652 p.695
921 P.2d 473 p.494

Cited by:
State v. Lei, 59 Wn.2d 1, 365 P.2d 609, 1961 Wash. LEXIS 459 (1961)
Cited by:
59 Wn.2d 1 p.3
365 P.2d 609 p.610

Cited by:
Adams v. Hinkle, 51 Wn.2d 763, 322 P.2d 844, 1958 Wash. LEXIS 501 (1958)
Cited by:
51 Wn.2d 763 p.767
322 P.2d 844 p.847

Cited by:
State v. Mountain Timber Co., 75 Wash. 581, 135 P. 645, 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1754, 1913 Wash. LEXIS 2251, L.R.A. (n.s.) 1917D10 (1913)
Cited by:
75 Wash. 581 p.590
135 P. 645 p.649

Cited by:
State v. Lybarger, 2 Wash. 552, 2 Wash. 564, 27 P. 449, 27 P. 1029 (1891)
Cited by:
2 Wash. 552 p.556
27 P. 449 p.450

WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME CT. OF APPEALS

Cited by:
Ex parte McNeeley, 36 W. Va. 84, 14 S.E. 436, 1892 W. Va. LEXIS 56, 32 Am. St. Rep. 831, 15 L.R.A. 226 (1892)
Cited by:
36 W. Va. 84 p.96
14 S.E. 436 p.440

Cited by:
Peerce v. Kitzmiller, 19 W. Va. 564, 1882 W. Va. LEXIS 12 (1882)
Cited by:
19 W. Va. 564 p.573

WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
State v. Lloyd, 152 Wis. 24, 139 N.W. 514, 1913 Wisc. LEXIS 37, Am. Ann. Cas. 1914C415 (Wis. 1913)
Cited by:
152 Wis. 24 p.27
139 N.W. 514 p.516

WISCONSIN 

Cited by:
2 Pin. 131, 2 Pin. 131, 1 Chand. 71
Cited by:
2 Pin. 131 p.143
1 Chand. 71 p.86

WYOMING SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Harris v. State, 34 Wyo. 175, 242 P. 411, 1926 Wyo. LEXIS 33 (1926)
Cited by:
34 Wyo. 175 p.182
242 P. 411 p.413

NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
SABLAN v. IGINOEF, 1 N. Mar. I. 551, 1990 N. Mar. I. LEXIS 34 (1990)

Cited by:
BORJA v. WESLEY GOODMAN & YOUNIS ARTS STUDIO, INC., 1 N. Mar. I. 225, 1990 N. Mar. I. LEXIS 14 (1990)

PUERTO RICO SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Ortiz Baez v. Tribunal Superior, 98 P.R.R. 254, 98 P.R. Dec. 261, 1970 PR Sup. LEXIS 58 (P.R. 1970)
Cited by:
98 P.R.R. 254 p.269

Cited by:
Ex Parte Hernandez Laureano, 54 P.R.R. 396, 54 P.R. Dec. 416, 1939 PR Sup. LEXIS 669 (P.R. 1939)
Cited by:
54 P.R.R. 396 p.401

Cited by:
El Pueblo v. Padilla, 20 P.R.R. 262, 20 P.R. Dec. 276, 1914 PR Sup. LEXIS 278 (P.R. 1914)
Cited by:
20 P.R.R. 262 p.265

Cited by:
El Pueblo v. Kent, 10 P.R.R. 325, 10 P.R. Dec. 343, 1906 PR Sup. LEXIS 205 (P.R. 1906)
Cited by:
10 P.R.R. 325 p.343

INDIAN TERRITORY

Cited by:
Glenn-Tucker v. Clayton, 4 Indian Terr. 511, 1902 Indian Terr. LEXIS 52, 70 S.W. 8 (1902)
Cited by:
4 Indian Terr. 511 p.524
70 S.W. 8 p.13

ANNOTATED STATUTES ( 4 Citing Statutes )

USCS Const. Preamble

USCS Const. Art. I, @ 10, Cl 1

Ark. Const. Art. 2, @ 22

Tenn. Const. art. I, @ 21

LAW REVIEWS AND PERIODICALS ( 563 Citing References )

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: EDUCATION AND THE CONSTITUTION: SHAPING EACH OTHER AND THE NEXTCENTURY: Teaching Free Speech from an Incomplete Fossil Record, 34 Akron L. Rev. 231 (2000)
Cited by:
34 Akron L. Rev. 231 p.231

Cited by:
COMMENT: "Your Weapons, You Will not Need Them."   n1 Comment on the Supreme Court's Sixty-Year Silence on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, 33 Akron L. Rev. 131 (1999)
Cited by:
33 Akron L. Rev. 131 p.131

Cited by:
ARTICLE: NEO-FEDERALISM, POPULAR SOVEREIGNITY, AND THE CRIMINAL LAW, 29 Akron L. Rev. 549 (1996)

Cited by:
2000 DANIEL J. MEADOR LECTURE: Hugo Black and the Hall of Fame, 53 Ala. L. Rev. 1221 (2002)
Cited by:
53 Ala. L. Rev. 1221 p.1221

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: WHEN DOES RETROACTIVITY CROSS THE LINE?: WINSTAR, EASTERN ENTERPRISES AND BEYOND: Substantive Due Process and Regulatory Takings: A Reappraisal, 51 Ala. L. Rev. 977 (2000)

Cited by:
CONTENT: Applying the Bill of Rights to the States: A Response to William P. Gray, Jr., 49 Ala. L. Rev. 551 (1998)

Cited by:
CONTENT: The Ten Commandments and the Ten Amendments: A Case Study in Religious Freedom in Alabama, 49 Ala. L. Rev. 509 (1998)

Cited by:
NOTE: Sidestepping Scott: Modifying Criminal Discovery in Alaska, 15 D. Alaska L. R. 33 (1998)

Cited by:
PERSPECTIVE: PRESUMED INNOCENT: THE LEGITIMACY OF INDEPENDENT STATE CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 61 Alb. L. Rev. 1507 (1998)
Cited by:
61 Alb. L. Rev. 1507 p.1507

Cited by:
NOTE: THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL OF CHOICE AFTER WHEAT V. UNITED STATES: WHOSE CHOICE IS IT? *, 39 Am. U.L. Rev. 437 (1990)

Cited by:
NOTE: OF TEXTBOOKS AND TENETS: MOZERT v. HAWKINS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION AND THE FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION., 37 Am. U.L. Rev. 985 (1988)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM--LAW AND CIVIL SOCIETY: PART II: TRADITIONAL FORMS OF SUB FEDERAL INSTITUTIONS: ARTICLE: NOTES FOR A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ORIGINS OF FEDERALISM IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA, 15 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. Law 93 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Underpinnings of the Public Trust Doctrine: Lessons from Illinois Central Railroad, 33 Ariz. St. L.J. 849 (2001)
Cited by:
33 Ariz. St. L.J. 849 p.849

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: FREE SPEECH AND COMMUNITY: A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO FREE SPEECH DOCTRINE, 29 Ariz. St. L.J. 461 (1997)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: NEGOTIATING ECONOMIC SURVIVAL: The Consent Principle and Tribal-State Compacts Under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 29 Ariz. St. L.J. 25 (1997)

Cited by:
TRANSCRIPT: The Goldwater Institute and the Federalist Society: Federalism and Judicial Mandates Edited Transcripts from the Panel Discussions Held in Phoenix, Arizona on November 3rd and 4th, 1995 *, 28 Ariz. St. L.J. 17 (1996)

Cited by:
Separate Sovereigns, Civil Rights, and the Sacred Text: The Legacy of Justice Thurgood Marshall's Indian Law Jurisprudence, 26 Ariz. St. L.J. 495 (1994)

Cited by:
ESSAY: "A Careless Written Letter" - Situating Amendments to the Federal Constitution, 51 Ark. L. Rev. 95 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Natural Law Foundation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, 48 Ark. L. Rev. 347 (1995)

Cited by:
COMMENT: REEXAMINING 100 YEARS OF SUPREME COURT REGULATORY TAKING DOCTRINE: THE PRINCIPLES OF "NOXIOUS USE," "AVERAGE RECIPROCITY OF ADVANTAGE," AND "BUNDLE OF RIGHTS" FROM MUGLER TO KEYSTONE BITUMINOUS COAL, 14 B. C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev 653 (1987)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Lessons From the Pupil: A Canadian Solution to the American Exclusionary Rule Debate, 22 B.C.Int'l & Comp.L.Rev. 77 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: RESURRECTING THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES CLAUSE AND REVISING THE SLAUGHTER-HOUSE CASES WITHOUT EXHUMING LOCHNER: INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT +, 38 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (1996)

Cited by:
NOTE: THE CASE FOR ACCESSION BY THE EUROPEAN UNION TO THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 14 B.U. Int'l L.J. 151 (1996)

Cited by:
NOTE: THE PUBLIC USE CLAUSE, COMMON SENSE AND TAKINGS, 10 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 335 (2001)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: EARLY EFFORTS TO SUPPRESS PROTEST: UNWANTED ABOLITIONIST SPEECH, 7 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 185 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: RIGHTING THE BALANCE: AN INQUIRY INTO THE FOUNDATIONS AND LIMITS OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, 78 B.U.L. Rev. 1275 (1998)
Cited by:
78 B.U.L. Rev. 1275 p.1275

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Threats, Free Speech, and the Jurisprudence of the Federal Criminal Law, 2002 BYU L. Rev. 829 (2002)
Cited by:
2002 BYU L. Rev. 829 p.829

Cited by:
RELIGIIOUS LIBERTY BOOK REVIEW SYMPOSIUM: The Tension Between a Godless Constitution and a Culture of Belief in an Age of Reason The Godless Constitution: The Case Against Religious Correctness by Isaac Kramnick & R. Laurence Moore W.W. Norton & Co. (1997), 1999 BYU L. Rev. 861 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Second Amendment in the Nineteenth Century, 1998 BYU L. Rev. 1359 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: SECOND AMENDMENT SYMPOSIUM: The Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Light of Thornton: The People and Essential Attributes of Sovereignty, 1998 BYU L. Rev. 137 (1998)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: THE DILEMMA OF AMERICAN FEDERALISM: POWER TO THE PEOPLE, THE STATES, OR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT?: Civil Rights and Federalism Fights: Is There a "More Perfect Union" for the Heirs to the Promise of Brown?, 1996 BYU L. Rev. 389 (1996)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: NEW DIRECTIONS IN RELIGIOUS LIBERTY: State Constitutional Protection of Religious Exercise: An Emerging Post-Smith Jurisprudence, 1993 BYU L. Rev. 275 (1993)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: NEW DIRECTIONS IN RELIGIOUS LIBERTY: The Religion Clause: A Double Guarantee of Religious Liberty, 1993 BYU L. Rev. 189 (1993)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Lemon   n1 Is a Lemon:   n2 Toward a Rational Interpretation of the Establishment Clause   n3, 12 BYU J. Pub. L. 1 (1997)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: A Proposal for Interpreting Corresponding United States and Texas Constitutional Guarantees in the New Millennium, 51 Baylor L. Rev. 269 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: CONSTITUTIONALISM, THE RULE OF RULES: EXPLORATIONS, 39 Brandeis L.J. 17 (2000)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: PEOPLE v. SCOTT * & PEOPLE v. KETA: ** "DEMOCRACY BEGINS IN CONVERSATION". ***, 58 Brook. L. Rev. 1279 (1993)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: CONSTITUTIONAL SEPARATION OF WAR POWERS: PROTECTING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LIBERTY., 57 Brook. L. Rev. 1083 (1992)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: THE IMPAIRMENTS OF CONTRACTS CLAUSE AND THE CORPORATION: A COMMENT ON PROFESSORS BUTLER'S AND RIBSTEIN'S THESIS., 55 Brook. L. Rev. 809 (1989)

Cited by:
NOTE: THE BILL OF ATTAINDER CLAUSE: AN UNQUALIFIED GUARANTEE OF PROCESS., 50 Brook. L. Rev. 77 (1983)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Can American Constitutional Law Be Postmodern? *, 42 Buff. L. Rev. 317 (1994)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Disestablishing Sex and Gender, 90 Cal. L. Rev. 997 (2002)
Cited by:
90 Cal. L. Rev. 997 p.997

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Contract Rights and Property Rights: A Case Study in the Relationship Between Individual Liberties and Constitutional Structure., 76 Cal. L. Rev. 267 (1988)
Cited by:
76 Cal. L. Rev. 267 p.268

Cited by:
73 Cal. L. Rev. 1482, 73 Cal. L. Rev. 1482
Cited by:
73 Cal. L. Rev. 1482 p.1483

Cited by:
69 Cal. L. Rev. 189
Cited by:
69 Cal. L. Rev. 189 p.263

Cited by:
61 Cal. L. Rev. 273
Cited by:
61 Cal. L. Rev. 273 p.273

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Criminal Justice in the Supreme Court: A Review of United States Supreme Court Criminal and Habeas Corpus Decisions (October 4, 1999 - October 1, 2000), 37 Cal. W. L. Rev. 239 (2001)
Cited by:
37 Cal. W. L. Rev. 239 p.239

Cited by:
ARTICLE: CONDITIONAL FEDERAL SPENDING AND THE STATES "FREEEXERCISE" OF THE TENTH AMENDMENT, 21 Campbell L. Rev. 5 (1998)

Cited by:
NOTE: RECLAIMING OUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS: A PROPOSAL FOR SCHOOL-WIDE DRUG TESTING, 21 Cardozo L. Rev. 999 (1999)

Cited by:
LAW AND THE POSTMODERN MIND: THE IDENTITY OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL SUBJECT, 16 Cardozo L. Rev. 1049 (1995)

Cited by:
NOTE: How Much is Enough? Assessing the Impact of Dolan v. City of Tigard, 46 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 193 (1995)
Cited by:
46 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 193 p.193

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Supreme Court and the Federal Judicial System, 42 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1209 (1992)
Cited by:
42 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1209 p.1209

Cited by:
THE INDIVIDUAL LIBERTIES WITHIN THE BODY OF THE CONSTITUTION: A SYMPOSIUM: Thinking about Habeas Corpus, 37 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 748 (1987)

Cited by:
NOTE: AMERICA'S DARK LITTLE SECRET: CHALLENGING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS PROVISION OF THE 1994 VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ACT, 47 Cath. U.L. Rev. 189 (1997)
Cited by:
47 Cath. U.L. Rev. 189 p.189

Cited by:
NOTES: SCHAD v. ARIZONA: JURY UNANIMITY ON TRIAL., 42 Cath. U.L. Rev. 355 (1993)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: LAND USE REGULATION IN THE REHNQUIST COURT: THE FIFTH AMENDMENT AND JUDICIAL INTERVENTION., 38 Cath. U.L. Rev. 847 (1989)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: PUTTING FAITH BACK INTO CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLARSHIP: A DEFENSE OF ORIGINALISM, 36 Catholic Law. 137 (1995)

Cited by:
STUDENT NOTE: THE SAME-SOVEREIGN RULE RESURRECTED: THE SUPREME COURT REJECTS THE INVOCATION OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT'S PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION BASED UPON FEAR OF FOREIGN PROSECUTION IN UNITED STATES V. BALSYS, 77 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 407 (2001)
Cited by:
77 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 407 p.407

Cited by:
76 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 403, 76 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 403
Cited by:
76 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 403 p.403

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT: FRESH LOOKS: THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN CONTEXT: THE CASE OF THE VANISHING PREDICATE, 76 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 403 (2000)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT: FRESH LOOKS: WHAT DOES THE SECOND AMENDMENT MEAN TODAY?, 76 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 291 (2000)
Cited by:
76 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 291 p.291

Cited by:
FREEDOM: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: "NEVER INTENDED TO BE APPLIED TO THE WHITEPOPULATION": FIREARMS REGULATION ANDRACIAL DISPARITY - THE REDEEMEDSOUTH'S LEGACYTO A NATIONAL JURISPRUDENCE? *, 70 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1307 (1995)
Cited by:
70 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1307 p.1307

Cited by:
FREEDOM: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CHARLES FAIRMAN, FELIX FRANKFURTER, ANDTHE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 70 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1197 (1995)
Cited by:
70 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1197 p.1197

Cited by:
FREEDOM: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CONSTRICTING THE LAW OF FREEDOM:JUSTICE MILLER, THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, AND THE SLAUGHTER-HOUSE CASES, 70 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 627 (1994)
Cited by:
70 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 627 p.627

Cited by:
THE 1859 CRISIS OVER HINTON HELPER'S BOOK, THE IMPENDING CRISIS: FREE SPEECH, SLAVERY, AND SOME LIGHT ON THE MEANING OF THE FIRST SECTION OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 68 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1113 (1993)

Cited by:
SLAVERY IN THE CANON OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 68 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1087 (1993)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM ON INTERPRETING THE NINTH AMENDMENT: CONSTITUTIONAL RHETORIC AND THE NINTH AMENDMENT, 64 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 131 (1988)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM ON INTERPRETING THE NINTH AMENDMENT: A MORAL REALIST DEFENSE OF CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY, 64 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 89 (1988)

Cited by:
NOTE AND COMMENT: DEFAMATION: EXTENSION OF THE "ACTUAL MALICE" STANDARD TO PRIVATE LITIGANTS COLSON V. STIEG 89 ILL. 2D 205, 433 N.E.2D 246 (1982), 59 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1153 (1983)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE HABEAS CORPUS SUSPENSION CLAUSE AFTER INS V. ST. CYR, 33 Colum. Human Rights L. Rev. 555 (2002)

Cited by:
CONTENT: THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT JUDGMENTS IN U.S. COURTS, 29 Colum. Human Rights L. Rev. 143 (1997)

Cited by:
CONSTITUTIONAL EQUALITY: EQUAL PROTECTION, "GENERAL EQUALITY" AND ECONOMIC DISCRIMINATION FROM A U.S. PERSPECTIVE, 5 Colum. J. Eur. L. 281 (1999)

Cited by:
NOTE: PRIVATE PARTY STANDING TO RAISE TENTH AMENDMENT COMMANDEERING CHALLENGES, 100 Colum. L. Rev. 1065 (2000)
Cited by:
100 Colum. L. Rev. 1065 p.1065

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE TAKINGS CLAUSE AND THE POLITICAL PROCESS, 95 Colum. L. Rev. 782 (1995)
Cited by:
95 Colum. L. Rev. 782 p.794

Cited by:
ARTICLE: DOUBLE JEOPARDY LAW AFTER RODNEY KING, 95 Colum. L. Rev. 1 (1995)
Cited by:
95 Colum. L. Rev. 1 p.3

Cited by:
THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED: CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT OUTSIDE ARTICLE V, 94 Colum. L. Rev. 457 (1994)
Cited by:
94 Colum. L. Rev. 457 p.494

Cited by:
ARTICLE: ERAS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT., 91 Colum. L. Rev. 1699 (1991)
Cited by:
91 Colum. L. Rev. 1699 p.1708

Cited by:
NOTE: LET US GO BACK AND STAND UPON THE CONSTITUTION: FEDERAL-STATE RELATIONS IN SCOTT V. SANDFORD., 90 Colum. L. Rev. 192 (1990)

Cited by:
NOTE: DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND INCREMENTAL CULPABILITY: A UNITARY ALTERNATIVE TO THE DUAL SOVEREIGNTY DOCTRINE., 86 Colum. L. Rev. 1697 (1986)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: FURTHER REFLECTIONS ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE OF LIVELIHOOD. *, 86 Colum. L. Rev. 1103 (1986)
Cited by:
86 Colum. L. Rev. 1103 p.1111

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Footnote Redux: A Carolene Products Reminiscence *, 82 Colum. L. Rev. 1093 (1982)
Cited by:
82 Colum. L. Rev. 1093 p.1097

Cited by:
79 Colum. L. Rev. 213
Cited by:
79 Colum. L. Rev. 213 p.213

Cited by:
75 Colum. L. Rev. 1413
Cited by:
75 Colum. L. Rev. 1413 p.1455

Cited by:
74 Colum. L. Rev. 1410
Cited by:
74 Colum. L. Rev. 1410 p.1411

Cited by:
NOTE: Honoring the Social Compact: Arguing for a State Duty of Protection Under the Connecticut Constitution, 33 Conn. L. Rev. 1069 (2001)
Cited by:
33 Conn. L. Rev. 1069 p.1069

Cited by:
NOTE: Automobile Searches and Judicial Decisionmaking Under State Constitutions: State v. Miller, 27 Conn. L. Rev. 699 (1995)

Cited by:
BOOK REVIEW: OUTSIDER VOICES ON GUNS AND THE CONSTITUTIONFREEDMEN, THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, AND THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, 1866-1876. By Stephen P. Halbrook. n1, 17 Const. Commentary 701 (2000)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: WHAT THE WALL SEPARATES: A DEBATE ON THOMAS JEFFERSON'S "WALL OF SEPARATION" METAPHOR, 16 Const. Commentary 627 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE VARIOLA VARIATION, 16 Const. Commentary 511 (1999)

Cited by:
REVIEW ESSAY: THE AKHIL REED AMAR BILL OF RIGHTSTHE BILL OF RIGHTS: CREATION AND RECONSTRUCTION. By Akhil Reed Amar.   n1 New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 1998. Pp. xv, 412. Cloth, $ 30.00., 16 Const. Commentary 373 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE OXYMORON RECONSIDERED: MYTH AND REALITY IN THE ORIGINS OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, 16 Const. Commentary 315 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: COMMANDEERING, THE TENTH AMENDMENT, AND THE FEDERAL REQUISITION POWER: NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES REVISITED, 15 Const. Commentary 355 (1998)

Cited by:
GETTING NORMATIVE: THE ROLE OF NATURAL RIGHTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION, 12 Const. Commentary 93 (1995)

Cited by:
THE HISTORICAL FRAMEWORK FOR REVIVING CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION FOR PROPERTY AND CONTRACT RIGHTS, 79 Cornell L. Rev. 87 (1993)
Cited by:
79 Cornell L. Rev. 87 p.107

Cited by:
66 Cornell L. Rev. 1
Cited by:
66 Cornell L. Rev. 1 p.5

Cited by:
60 Cornell L. Rev. 231
Cited by:
60 Cornell L. Rev. 231 p.252

Cited by:
CASENOTE: THE SPECIAL NEEDS EXCEPTION TO THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AND HOW IT APPLIES TO GOVERNMENT DRUG TESTING OF PREGNANT WOMEN: THE SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES WHERE THE LINES ARE DRAWN IN FERGUSON V. CITY OF CHARLESTON, 35 Creighton L. Rev. 857 (2002)
Cited by:
35 Creighton L. Rev. 857 p.857

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE GRAND JURY IN NEBRASKA, 33 Creighton L. Rev. 39 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE ECONOMICS OF ACTUAL MALICE: A PROPOSAL FOR LEGISLATIVE CHANGE TO THE RULE OF NEW YORK TIMES V. SULLIVAN, 32 Cumb. L. Rev. 519 (2001)
Cited by:
32 Cumb. L. Rev. 519 p.519

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT: JUSTICE BRADLEY'S TWENTIETH CENTURY LEGACY, 29 Cumb. L. Rev. 143 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: TRUISM, TAUTOLOGY OR VITAL PRINCIPLE? THE TENTH AMENDMENT SINCE UNITED STATES V. DARBY, 27 Cumb. L. Rev. 445 (1996)

Cited by:
CUMBERLAND SCHOOL OF LAWDISTINGUISHED LECTURER SERIES: * Remarks of Featured Speaker: **RECONSTRUCTING DOUBLE JEOPARDY:SOME THOUGHTS ON THE RODNEY KING CASE, 26 Cumb. L. Rev. 1 (1995)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: FEDERALISM, FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS, AND THE RELIGION CLAUSES, 25 Cumb. L. Rev. 247 (1995)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: WHEN SILENCE RESOUNDS: CLERGY AND THE REQUIREMENT TO REPORT ELDER ABUSE AND NEGLECT, 49 DePaul L. Rev. 1 (1999)
Cited by:
49 DePaul L. Rev. 1 p.1

Cited by:
NOTE: UNITED STATES v. BALSYS: FOREIGN PROSECUTION AND THE APPLICABILITY OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION, 48 DePaul L. Rev. 987 (1999)
Cited by:
48 DePaul L. Rev. 987 p.987

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Rael v. Taylor and the Colorado Constitution: How Human Rights Law Ensures Constitutional Protection in the Private Sphere, 26 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 1 (1997)

Cited by:
NOTE: A Page of History or a Volume of Logic?: Reassessing the Supreme Court's Establishment Clause Jurisprudence, 73 Denv. U.L. Rev. 507 (1996)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Consent of the Governed: Recall of United States Senators, 103 Dick. L. Rev. 567 (1999)
Cited by:
103 Dick. L. Rev. 567 p.567

Cited by:
A TALE OF THREE WARS: TINKER IN CONSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT, 48 Drake L. Rev. 507 (2000)

Cited by:
FRONTIERS OF LEGAL THOUGHT II THE NEW FIRST AMENDMENT: REGULATING RACIST SPEECH ON CAMPUS: A MODEST PROPOSAL? $(+$), 1990 Duke L.J. 484 (1990)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE CONSTITUTION IN THE SUPREME COURT: CIVIL RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES, 1930-1941., 1987 Duke L.J. 800 (1987)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE CONSTITUTION IN THE SUPREME COURT: 1921-1930., 1986 Duke L.J. 65 (1986)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE CONSTITUTION IN THE SUPREME COURT: 1910-1921., 1985 Duke L.J. 1111 (1985)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE CONSTITUTION IN THE SUPREME COURT: ARTICLE IV AND FEDERAL POWERS, 1836-1864., 1983 Duke L.J. 695 (1983)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE CONSTITUTION IN THE SUPREME COURT: CONTRACTS AND COMMERCE, 1836-1864., 1983 Duke L.J. 471 (1983)

Cited by:
NOTE: WHY MODEST PROPOSALS OFFER THE BEST SOLUTION FOR COMBATING RACIAL PROFILING, 50 Duke L.J. 331 (2000)
Cited by:
50 Duke L.J. 331 p.331

Cited by:
NOTE: CLASSICAL REPUBLICANISM AND THE FIFTH AMENDMENT'S "PUBLIC USE" REQUIREMENT, 49 Duke L.J. 339 (1999)

Cited by:
TWENTY-FIFTH ANNUAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW ISSUE: ESSAY: THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND THE PERSONAL RIGHT TO ARMS, 43 Duke L.J. 1236 (1994)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: "Privilege Against Public Right:" A Reappraisal of the Charles River Bridge Case, 33 Duq. L. Rev. 1 (1994)

Cited by:
COMMENT: THE GOVERNMENT'S RIGHT TO READ: MAINTAINING STATE ACCESS TO DIGITAL DATA IN THE AGE OF IMPENETRABLE ENCRYPTION, 49 Emory L.J. 711 (2000)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: FIRST PRINCIPLES OF AMERICAN FEDERALISM AND THE NATURE OF FEDERAL CRIMINAL JURISDICTION, 45 Emory L.J. 1 (1996)

Cited by:
OUR DECLARATORY NINTH AMENDMENT, 42 Emory L.J. 967 (1993)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE CONSTITUTION IN THE SUPREME COURT: 1946-1953, 37 Emory L.J. 249 (1988)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: ANTIMONOPOLY TRADITION UNDER THE NINTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS: SLAUGHTER-HOUSE CASES RE-EXAMINED, 31 Emory L.J. 785 (1982)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: TAKINGS AND BEYOND: IMPLICATIONS FOR REGULATION, 19 Energy L. J. 25 (1998)
Cited by:
19 Energy L. J. 25 p.46

Cited by:
ARTICLE: "GREENING" THE CONSTITUTION - HARMONIZING ENVIRONMENTAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL VALUES, 32 Envtl. L. 809 (2002)
Cited by:
32 Envtl. L. 809 p.809

Cited by:
OREGON LAND USE SYMPOSIUM: ARTICLE: SPECTRE AT THE CELEBRATION: WILL SAN DIEGO GAS HINDER OREGON'S TEN-YEAR-OLD LAND USE PROGRAM?, 14 Envtl. L. 661 (1984)

Cited by:
COMMENT: THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION: STILL CHAMPION OF CITIZENS' RIGHTS?, 25 Fla. St. U.L. Rev. 87 (1997)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: AIDS DISCRIMINATION UNDER FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAW AFTER ARLINE, 15 Fla. St. U.L. Rev. 221 (1987)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: RESPONSIBILITY, CAUSATION, AND THE HARM-BENEFIT LINE IN TAKINGS JURISPRUDENCE, 6 Fordham Envtl. Law J. 433 (1995)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: CURRENT ISSUES IN MEDIA AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS LAW: Food Lion and the Media's Liability for Newsgathering Torts: A Symposium Preview, 7 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 389 (1997)

Cited by:
NOTE: DOES LOCHNER LIVE IN LUXEMBOURG?: AN ANALYSIS OF THE PROPERTY RIGHTS JURISPRUDENCE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE, 18 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1778 (1995)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: AMBITION'S PLAYGROUND, 68 Fordham L. Rev. 1107 (2000)
Cited by:
68 Fordham L. Rev. 1107 p.1107

Cited by:
ARTICLE: EQUAL PROTECTION AND MORAL CIRCUMSTANCE: ACCOUNTING FOR CONSTITUTIONAL BASICS., 59 Fordham L. Rev. 485 (1991)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE SUPREME COURT AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION FROM 1791 TO 1917., 55 Fordham L. Rev. 263 (1986)

Cited by:
NOTE: DUAL SOVEREIGNTY AND THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE: IF AT FIRST YOU DON'T CONVICT, TRY, TRY AGAIN, 24 Fordham Urb. L.J. 353 (1997)

Cited by:
NOTE: "ONE MANNER OF LAW": THE SUPREME COURT, STARE DECISIS AND THE IMMIGRATION LAW PLENARY POWER DOCTRINE, 24 Fordham Urb. L.J. 165 (1996)

Cited by:
NOTE: FROM SINDELL TO STREET PUSHERS: IMPOSING MARKET SHARE TORT LIABILITY ON ILLEGAL DRUG DEALERS, 33 Ga. L. Rev. 315 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE PAST AND FUTURE OF THE INDIVIDUAL'S RIGHT TO ARMS, 31 Ga. L. Rev. 1 (1996)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: LIBERTY AND THE CONSTITUTION, 29 Ga. L. Rev. 585 (1995)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Incorporation of the Bill of Rights: A Response to Michael Zuckert, 26 Ga. L. Rev. 1 (1991)

Cited by:
Metro Broadcasting Inc. v. FCC, 25 Ga. L. Rev. 535 (1991)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Exclusion of Evidence in Federal Prosecutions on the Basis of State Law, 22 Ga. L. Rev. 667 (1988)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Is Disparity a Problem?, 22 Ga. L. Rev. 283 (1988)

Cited by:
FEDERALISM: ALLOCATING RESPONSIBILITY BETWEEN THE FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS: ARTICLE: Why Professor Redish is Wrong About Abstention, 19 Ga. L. Rev. 1097 (1985)

Cited by:
NOTE & COMMENT: CHANDLER V. UNITED STATES: DOES THE DEFENSE ATTORNEY HAVE A LEGAL OBLIGATION TO PRESENT MITIGATION EVIDENCE IN ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEATH PENALTY CASES?, 18 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 563 (2001)
Cited by:
18 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 563 p.563

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM BOOK REVIEW: Structure, Participation, Citizenship, and Right: Lessons from Akhil Amar's Second and Fourteenth Amendments: The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction. By Akhil Reed Amar, 87 Geo. L.J. 2307 (1999)
Cited by:
87 Geo. L.J. 2307 p.2307

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM BOOK REVIEW: We Are All Federalists, We Are All Republicans:   n1 Holism, Synthesis, and the Fourteenth Amendment: The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction. By Akhil Reed Amar, 87 Geo. L.J. 2273 (1999)
Cited by:
87 Geo. L.J. 2273 p.2273

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Fundamental Property Rights, 85 Geo. L.J. 555 (1997)
Cited by:
85 Geo. L.J. 555 p.572

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye: Of Animal Sacrifice and Religious Persecution, 85 Geo. L.J. 1 (1996)
Cited by:
85 Geo. L.J. 1 p.4

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Fourth Amendment as Constitutional Theory., 77 Geo. L.J. 19 (1988)
Cited by:
77 Geo. L.J. 19 p.80

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Ninth Amendment and the "Jurisprudence of Original Intention.", 74 Geo. L.J. 1719 (1986)
Cited by:
74 Geo. L.J. 1719 p.1735

Cited by:
BACKGROUND: "High Crimes and Misdemeanors": Recovering the Intentions of the Founders, 67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 626 (1999)
Cited by:
67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 626 p.626

Cited by:
TEXTUALISM AND THE CIVIL WAR AMENDMENT: Two Textual Adventures: Thoughts on Reading Jeffrey Rosen's Paper, 66 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1269 (1998)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM ON CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES: The New Right Assault on Moral Inquiry in Constitutional Law., 54 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 253 (1986)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Mark Tushnet's Critique of Interpretivism., 51 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 532 (1983)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Toward a Theory of the Washington Constitution*, 37 Gonz. L. Rev. 41 (2001)
Cited by:
37 Gonz. L. Rev. 41 p.41

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Teaching Legal Analysis Using a Pluralistic Model of Law, 36 Gonz. L. Rev. 433 (2000)
Cited by:
36 Gonz. L. Rev. 433 p.433

Cited by:
REVIEW: Parchment Barriers: Antonin Scalia, Jack Rakove, James Madison, & The Meaning of Rights: Jack N. Rakove: Declaring Rights: A Brief History with Documents: Bedford Books 1998, 1 Green Bag 2d 433 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: "I HAVE A DREAM -- NEVER FORGET": WHEN RHETORIC BECOMES LAW, A COMPARISON OF THE JURISPRUDENCE OF RACE IN GERMANY AND THE UNITED STATES, 14 Harv. BlackLetter J. 113 (1998)

Cited by:
NOTE: Reading the Privileges or Immunities Clause: Textual Irony, Analytical Revisionism, and an Interpretive Truce, 35 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 569 (2000)

Cited by:
NOTE: HAGUE V. CIO AND THE ROOTS OF PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE: TRANSLATING LIMITS OF POWERS INTO INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, 28 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 533 (1993)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: "I WILL BUILD MY HOUSE WITH STICKS": THE SPLINTERING OF PROPERTY INTERESTS UNDER THE FIFTH AMENDMENT MAY BE HAZARDOUS TO PRIVATE PROPERTY, 20 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 397 (1996)

Cited by:
NOTE: Democracy in the Details: A Plea for Substance over Form in Statutory Interpretation, 37 Harv. J. on Legis. 187 (2000)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: A Lockean Analysis of Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment, 25 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 1095 (2002)

Cited by:
ESSAY: THE TENTH AMENDMENT AMONG THE SHADOWS: ON READING THE CONSTITUTION IN PLATO'S CAVE *, 23 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 551 (2000)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: A BLESSING IN DISGUISE: PROTECTING MINORITY FAITHS THROUGH STATE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM NON-RESTORATION ACTS, 23 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 411 (2000)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: GUN SHY: THE SECOND AMENDMENT AS AN "UNDERENFORCED CONSTITUTIONAL NORM", 21 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 719 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: BLAINE'S WAKE: SCHOOL CHOICE, THE FIRST AMENDMENT, AND STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 21 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 657 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: INTRATEXTUALISM, 112 Harv. L. Rev. 747 (1999)
Cited by:
112 Harv. L. Rev. 747 p.797

Cited by:
108 Harv. L. Rev. 1223, 108 Harv. L. Rev. 1223
Cited by:
108 Harv. L. Rev. 1223 p.1239

Cited by:
ARTICLE: TAKING TEXT AND STRUCTURE SERIOUSLY: REFLECTIONS ON FREE-FORM METHOD IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION TAKING TEXT AND STRUCTURE SERIOUSLY: REFLECTIONS ON FREE-FORM METHOD IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 108 Harv. L. Rev. 1221 (1995)

Cited by:
NOTES: RETHINKING THE INCORPORATION OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE: A FEDERALIST VIEW., 105 Harv. L. Rev. 1700 (1992)

Cited by:
BOOK NOTE COMMEMORATING THE BICENTENNIAL OF THE CONSTITUTION: A RADICAL INTENT. NO STATE SHALL ABRIDGE: THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS. By Michael Kent Curtis.   n1, 101 Harv. L. Rev. 869 (1988)

Cited by:
NOTE: POLITICAL RIGHTS AS POLITICAL QUESTIONS: THE PARADOX OF LUTHER V. BORDEN., 100 Harv. L. Rev. 1125 (1987)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING OF ORIGINAL INTENT., 98 Harv. L. Rev. 885 (1985)
Cited by:
98 Harv. L. Rev. 885 p.947

Cited by:
ARTICLE: FOLLOWING THE RULES LAID DOWN: A CRITIQUE OF INTERPRETIVISM AND NEUTRAL PRINCIPLES, 96 Harv. L. Rev. 781 (1983)
Cited by:
96 Harv. L. Rev. 781 p.789

Cited by:
90 Harv. L. Rev. 489
Cited by:
90 Harv. L. Rev. 489 p.493

Cited by:
ARTICLE: A Third Theory of Liberty: The Evolution of Our Conception of Freedom in American Constitutional Thought, 29 Hastings Const. L.Q. 115 (2002)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Missing Pieces of the Debate Over Federal Property Rights Legislation, 27 Hastings Const. L.Q. 1 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Section Three of the Defense of Marriage Act: Is Marriage Reserved to the States?, 26 Hastings Const. L.Q. 419 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: "Public Use" and the Original Understanding of the So-Called "Takings" Clause, 53 Hastings L.J. 1245 (2002)
Cited by:
53 Hastings L.J. 1245 p.1245

Cited by:
NOTE: The Second Amendment and the Incorporation Conundrum: Towards a Workable Jurisprudence, 50 Hastings L.J. 177 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The New Habeas, 42 Hastings L.J. 941 (1991)

Cited by:
BOOK NOTE: More Harm Than Good? NO STATE SHALL ABRIDGE: THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS., 38 Hastings L.J. 1023 (1987)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Federalism and Fundamental Rights: The Ninth Amendment., 38 Hastings L.J. 305 (1987)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: BEGUILED: FREE EXERCISE EXEMPTIONS AND THE SIREN SONG OF LIBERALISM., 20 Hofstra L. Rev. 245 (1991)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE STANDARD OF CULPABILITY IN SECTION 1983 AND BIVENS ACTIONS: THE PRIMA FACIE CASE, QUALIFIED IMMUNITY AND THE CONSTITUTION., 11 Hofstra L. Rev. 557 (1983)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE FREE SPEECH METAMORPHOSIS OF MR. JUSTICE HOLMES., 11 Hofstra L. Rev. 97 (1982)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE STANDING: THE NOT VERY REVOLUTIONARY DECISION AT VALLEY FORGE., 11 Hofstra L. Rev. 63 (1982)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Federal and State Bills of Rights: A Historical Look at the Relationship Between America's Documents of Individual Freedom, 36 How. L.J. 43 (1993)
Cited by:
36 How. L.J. 43 p.43

Cited by:
CASE NOTE: Constitutional Law -- Safeguarding Eighth Amendment Rights with a Comparative Proportionality Review in the Imposition of the Death Penalty: Pulley v. Harris.   n1, 28 How. L.J. 331 (1985)
Cited by:
28 How. L.J. 331 p.331

Cited by:
CASE NOTE: Fifth Amendment -- The Waiver of Counsel for a Polygraph Examination Extends to the Post-Polygraph Interrogation: Wyrick v. Fields.   n1, 27 How. L.J. 393 (1984)
Cited by:
27 How. L.J. 393 p.393

Cited by:
ARTICLE & ESSAY: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT: THE (IN)ABILITY OF STATES TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENTS WITH FOREIGN NATIONS, 6 ILSA J Int'l & Comp L 575 (2000)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Privacy Paradox: The Divergent Paths of the United States Supreme Court and State Courts on Issues of Sexuality, 33 Ind. L. Rev. 863 (2000)
Cited by:
33 Ind. L. Rev. 863 p.863

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: Listening to the "Sounds of Sovereignty" But Missing the Beat: Does the New Federalism Really Matter?, 32 Ind. L. Rev. 11 (1998)
Cited by:
32 Ind. L. Rev. 11 p.11

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Harmonic Convergence? Constitutional Criminal Procedure in an International Context, 75 Ind. L.J. 809 (2000)
Cited by:
75 Ind. L.J. 809 p.809

Cited by:
REVIEW: Ronald Dworkin's The Moral Reading of the Constitution: A Critique *, 72 Ind. L.J. 1099 (1997)
Cited by:
72 Ind. L.J. 1099 p.1099

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Ninth Life: An Interpretive Theory of the Ninth Amendment *, 69 Ind. L.J. 759 (1994)

Cited by:
BOOK REVIEW: An Assault Upon "TAKINGS" Doctrine: Finding New Answers in Old Theory + TAKINGS: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain By Richard A. Epstein, 63 Ind. L.J. 113 (1987)

Cited by:
ESSAY: A Brief History of the Adoption of the United States Constitution +, 75 Iowa L. Rev. 891 (1990)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: IN CELEBRATION OF THE BICENTENNIAL OF THE CONSTITUTION: Possession vs. Distribution in the Constitutional Idea of Property, 72 Iowa L. Rev. 1319 (1987)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: IN CELEBRATION OF THE BICENTENNIAL OF THE CONSTITUTION: Original Understanding, Legal Realism, and the Interpretation of "This Constitution" *, 72 Iowa L. Rev. 1177 (1987)

Cited by:
SUPREME COURT REVIEW: DENYING FIFTH AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS TO WITNESSES FACING FOREIGN PROSECUTIONS: SELF-INCRIMINATION DISCRIMINATION?, 89 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1095 (1999)

Cited by:
CRIMINAL LAW: TOWARD THE DECENTRALIZATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND SELECTIVE DISINCORPORATION, 87 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 63 (1996)

Cited by:
SUPREME COURT REVIEW: SIXTH AMENDMENT -- DUE PROCESS ON DRUGS: THE IMPLICATIONS OF FORCIBLY MEDICATING PRETRIAL DETAINEES WITH ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS: Riggins v. Nevada, 112 S. Ct. 1810 (1992), 83 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 836 (1993)

Cited by:
COMMENT: The Sixth Amendment as Constitutional Theory: Does Originalism Require That Massiah be Abandoned?, 82 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 423 (1991)

Cited by:
SUPREME COURT REVIEW: FOURTH AMENDMENT -- PROTECTION AGAINST UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND SEIZURE: THE INADEQUACIES OF USING AN ANONYMOUS TIP TO PROVIDE REASONABLE SUSPICION FOR AN INVESTIGATORY STOP: Alabama v. White, 110 S. Ct. 2412 (1990), 81 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 760 (1991)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Criminal Law: Heath v. Alabama: A Case Study of Doctrine and Rationality in the Supreme Court, 76 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 801 (1985)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Criminal Law: The Exclusionary Rule and Its Alternatives -- Remedies for Constitutional Violations in Canada and the United States, 76 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 608 (1985)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: CATCHING SMOKE, NAILING JELL-O TO A WALL: THE VANNA WHITE CASE AND THE LIMITS OF CELEBRITY RIGHTS, 3 J. Intell. Prop. L. 67 (1995)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Rehnquist Court's Federalism Decisions in Perspective, 15 J. L. & Politics 127 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE "CONSTITUTIONAL REMAND": JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONALLY DUBIOUS STATUTES, 14 J. L. & Politics 667 (1998)

Cited by:
LEGAL HISTORY: Highlights in North American Litigation During the Twentieth Century on Artificial Fluoridation of Public Water Supplies, 14 J. Land Use & Envtl. Law 195 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS IN EMERGING FEDERAL SYSTEMS:  n1 THE MARSHALL COURT AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1063 (2000)
Cited by:
33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1063 p.1063

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE MARSHALL COURT AND PROPERTY RIGHTS: A REAPPRAISAL, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1023 (2000)
Cited by:
33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1023 p.1023

Cited by:
ARTICLE: RECOVERING THE WORLD OF THE MARSHALL COURT, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 781 (2000)
Cited by:
33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 781 p.781

Cited by:
ARTICLE: CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN MARSHALL AND THE COURSE OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 743 (2000)
Cited by:
33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 743 p.743

Cited by:
REVIEW ESSAY: CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN MARSHALL IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 137 (1997)
Cited by:
31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 137 p.137

Cited by:
ARTICLE: DISCLOSURE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENTS' RECORDS: DO THE 1999 IDEA * REGULATIONS MANDATE THAT SCHOOLS COMPLY WITH FERPA? **, 8 J.L. & Pol'y 455 (2000)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Other People's Money: Washington Legal Foundation v. Texas Equal Access to Justice Foundation, 6 Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 56 (1997)

Cited by:
CONTROVERSIAL DECISIONS OF THE 1994-95 SUPREME COURT TERM: Does Federalism Promote Liberty?, 5 Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 15 (1996)

Cited by:
The Constitutional Illegitimacy of Expansive Judicial Power: A Populist Structural Interpretive Analysis, 89 Ky. L.J. 387 (2000)
Cited by:
89 Ky. L.J. 387 p.387

Cited by:
Purchasing the Right to Govern:Winstar and the Need to Reconceptualize the Law of Regulatory Agreements, 88 Ky. L.J. 245 (2000)
Cited by:
88 Ky. L.J. 245 p.245

Cited by:
ESSAY: Justice Charles M. Leibson and the Revival of State Constitutional Law: A Microcosm of a Movement, 86 Ky. L.J. 1009 (1998)
Cited by:
86 Ky. L.J. 1009 p.1009

Cited by:
LECTURE: Celebrating (?) the Bill of Rights: The Root, Branch, and Foliage of American Liberty *, 80 Ky. L.J. 843 (1992)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Complex Product Design Litigation: A Need for More Capable Fact-Finders, 79 Ky. L.J. 477 (1991)

Cited by:
NOTE: Alden v. Maine: Protecting the States at the Expense of the People, 62 La. L. Rev. 275 (2001)
Cited by:
62 La. L. Rev. 275 p.275

Cited by:
REVIEW OF RECENT DEVELOPMENT: 1992-1993: LOUISIANA CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 54 La. L. Rev. 683 (1994)

Cited by:
COMMENT: CONSTITUTIONAL FICTION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S INTERPRETATION OF THE RELIGION CLAUSES., 47 La. L. Rev. 169 (1986)

Cited by:
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW: A Symposium: EXPROPRIATION., 43 La. L. Rev. 439 (1982)

Cited by:
28 Land & Water L. Rev. 627
Cited by:
28 Land & Water L. Rev. 627 p.651

Cited by:
21 Land & Water L. Rev. 527
Cited by:
21 Land & Water L. Rev. 527 p.544

Cited by:
53 Law & Contemp. Probs. No. 3 79
Cited by:
53 Law & Contemp. Probs. No. 3 79 p.80

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Slavery as an Interpretive Issue in the Reconstruction Congresses, 34 Law & Soc'y Rev. 315 (2000)

Cited by:
GENERAL ARTICLE: Measuring the Importance of Supreme Court Decisions *, 90 Law Libr. J. 183 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Constitution, the Punishment of Death, and Misguided "Originalism", 1999 L. Rev. M.S.U.-D.C.L. 913 (1999)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: ELDRED V. ASHCROFT: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, CONGRESSIONAL POWER, AND THE CONSTITUTION: THE DUBIOUS CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE COPYRIGHT TERM EXTENSION ACT, 36 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 123 (2002)
Cited by:
36 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 123 p.123

Cited by:
ARTICLE: A COMPARISON OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND THE UNITED STATES, 34 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 81 (2000)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM ON NEW DIRECTIONS IN FEDERALISM: ACCOMMODATION BY DECLARATION, 33 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1375 (2000)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM ON THE CALIFORNIA INITIATIVE PROCESS: THE GUARANTEE CLAUSE IN CALIFORNIA: STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON INITIATIVES CHANGING THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, 31 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1305 (1998)

Cited by:
TRAVELLING DOWN THE UNSTEADY PATH: UNITED STATES v. LOPEZ, NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES, AND THE TENTH AMENDMENT, 29 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 99 (1995)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: ARRESTS WITHOUT PROSECUTION AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, 59 Md. L. Rev. 1 (2000)
Cited by:
59 Md. L. Rev. 1 p.1

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Tree Preservation Ordinances: Sacrificing Private Timber Rights on the Diminutive Altar of Public Benefit, 52 Mercer L. Rev. 705 (2001)
Cited by:
52 Mercer L. Rev. 705 p.705

Cited by:
ARTICLE: WHEN CONSTITUTIONAL WORLDS COLLIDE: RESURRECTING THE FRAMERS' BILL OF RIGHTS AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 145 (2001)
Cited by:
100 Mich. L. Rev. 145 p.145

Cited by:
VI. LEGAL HISTORY: THE QUALITIES OF COMPLETENESS: MORE? OR LESS?The Complete Bill of Rights: The Drafts, Debates, Sources, & Origins. Edited by Neil H. Cogan. New York: Ox ford University Press. 1997. Pp. lx, 708. $ 95., 97 Mich. L. Rev. 1629 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: FIFTH AMENDMENT FIRST PRINCIPLES: THE SELF-INCRIMINATION CLAUSE, 93 Mich. L. Rev. 857 (1995)
Cited by:
93 Mich. L. Rev. 857 p.876

Cited by:
INCORPORATING THE SUSPENSION CLAUSE: IS THERE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS FOR STATE PRISONERS?, 92 Mich. L. Rev. 862 (1994)
Cited by:
92 Mich. L. Rev. 862 p.889

Cited by:
COLLOQUY: Extraterritorial Regulation of Abortion: CONFLICT OF CONSTITUTIONS? NO THANKS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSORS BRILMAYER AND KREIMER., 91 Mich. L. Rev. 939 (1993)
Cited by:
91 Mich. L. Rev. 939 p.947

Cited by:
1992 SURVEY OF BOOKS RELATING TO THE LAW; IV. AMERICAN LEGAL HISTORY: ZERO-SUM MADISON. PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THE LIMITS OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM. By Jennifer Nedelsky., 90 Mich. L. Rev. 1392 (1992)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE FAILED DISCOURSE OF STATE CONSTITUTIONALISM., 90 Mich. L. Rev. 761 (1992)
Cited by:
90 Mich. L. Rev. 761 p.773

Cited by:
ARTICLE: STRUCTURAL FREE EXERCISE., 90 Mich. L. Rev. 477 (1991)
Cited by:
90 Mich. L. Rev. 477 p.541

Cited by:
1987 SURVEY OF BOOKS RELATING TO THE LAW: IV. THE FEDERAL COURTS AND THE CONSTITUTION: NO STATE SHALL ABRIDGE: THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS. By Michael Kent Curtis., 85 Mich. L. Rev. 1188 (1987)

Cited by:
1984 SURVEY OF BOOKS RELATING TO THE LAW: I. THE FEDERAL COURTS AND THE CONSTITUTION: JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CONSTITUTIONAL ETHICS. CONSTITUTIONAL FATE: THEORY OF THE CONSTITUTION. By Philip Bobbitt., 82 Mich. L. Rev. 665 (1984)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: HANDGUN PROHIBITION AND THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT., 82 Mich. L. Rev. 204 (1983)
Cited by:
82 Mich. L. Rev. 204 p.247

Cited by:
80 Mich. L. Rev. 462
Cited by:
80 Mich. L. Rev. 462 p.487

Cited by:
79 Mich. L. Rev. 1033
Cited by:
79 Mich. L. Rev. 1033 p.1040

Cited by:
75 Mich. L. Rev. 1320
Cited by:
75 Mich. L. Rev. 1320 p.1326

Cited by:
74 Mich. L. Rev. 191
Cited by:
74 Mich. L. Rev. 191 p.256

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Taking "Privileges or Immunities" Seriously: A Call to Expand the Constitutional Canon, 87 Minn. L. Rev. 153 (2002)
Cited by:
87 Minn. L. Rev. 153 p.153

Cited by:
Exhaustion of Tribal Remedies in the Lower Courts After National Farmers Union and Iowa Mutual: Toward a Consistent Treatment of Tribal Courts by the Federal Judicial System, 78 Minn. L. Rev. 259 (1993)
Cited by:
78 Minn. L. Rev. 259 p.264

Cited by:
66 Minn. L. Rev. 95
Cited by:
66 Minn. L. Rev. 95 p.112

Cited by:
60 Minn. L. Rev. 1113
Cited by:
60 Minn. L. Rev. 1113 p.1118

Cited by:
57 Minn. L. Rev. 639
Cited by:
57 Minn. L. Rev. 639 p.646

Cited by:
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND CIVIL RIGHTS SYMPOSIUM, PART II: IN DEFENSE OF CONGRESSIONAL POWER AND MINORITY RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 68 Miss. L.J. 431 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE GREAT DISSENTERS: PARALLEL CURRENTS IN HOLMES AND SCALIA, 67 Miss. L.J. 397 (1997)

Cited by:
TRENDS IN FIRST AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE: Expiating the Sins of Yoder and Smith: Toward a Unified Theory of First Amendment Exemptions From Neutral Laws of General Applicability, 66 Mo. L. Rev. 9 (2001)
Cited by:
66 Mo. L. Rev. 9 p.9

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Gun "Control" Laws Violate the Second Amendment and May Lead to Higher Crime Rates, 63 Mo. L. Rev. 155 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Private Accountability and the Fourteenth Amendment; State Action, Federalism and Congress, 59 Mo. L. Rev. 499 (1994)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM ISSUE: ARTICLE: The Second Amendment Today Historical & Contemporary Perspectives on the Constitutionality of Firearms Regulation: Symposium Introduction, 29 N. Ky. L. Rev. 643 (2002)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: SALMON P. CHASE AS JURIST AND POLITICIAN: COMMENT ON G. EDWARD WHITE, RECONSTRUCTING CHASE'S JURISPRUDENCE, 21 N. Ky. L. Rev. 133 (1993)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: RECONSTRUCTING THE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE OF SALMON P. CHASE, 21 N. Ky. L. Rev. 41 (1993)

Cited by:
COMMENT: Political Patronage and North Carolina Law: Is Political Conformity with the Sheriff a Permissible Job Requirement for Deputies?, 79 N.C. L. Rev. 1743 (2001)
Cited by:
79 N.C. L. Rev. 1743 p.1743

Cited by:
ARTICLE: HISTORICAL LINGUISTICS, INKBLOTS, AND LIFE AFTER DEATH: THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES OF CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES, 78 N.C. L. Rev. 1071 (2000)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Finding the Constitution: An Economic Analysis of Tradition's Role in Constitutional Interpretation, 77 N.C. L. Rev. 409 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: BRINGING FORWARD THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS: DO TEXT, HISTORY, OR PRECEDENT STAND IN THE WAY?, 75 N.C. L. Rev. 781 (1997)

Cited by:
SURVEY OF DEVELOPMENTS IN NORTH CAROLINA AND THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 1995: STATUTORY DEVELOPMENT: Public Endangerment or Personal Liberty? North Carolina Enacts a Liberalized Concealed Handgun Statute, 74 N.C. L. Rev. 2214 (1996)

Cited by:
SURVEY OF DEVELOPMENTS IN NORTH CAROLINA AND THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 1995: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: Over the Edge: The Fourth Circuit's Commercial Speech Analysis in Penn Advertising and Anheuser-Busch, 74 N.C. L. Rev. 2086 (1996)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: AKHIL AMAR ON CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: "HERE I GO DOWN THAT WRONG ROAD AGAIN", 74 N.C. L. Rev. 1559 (1996)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: LOCHNER ERA JURISPRUDENCE AND THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL TRADITION., 70 N.C. L. Rev. 1 (1991)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: "TO ENDURE FOR AGES TO COME": A BICENTENNIAL VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION: CONCEIVED IN LIBERTY: THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS., 65 N.C. L. Rev. 889 (1987)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: FULL FAITH AND CREDIT AND SECTION 1983: A REAPPRAISAL., 63 N.C. L. Rev. 59 (1984)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: STATE V. GOMEZ AND THE CONTINUING CONVERSATION OVER NEW MEXICO'S STATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS JURISPRUDENCE, 28 N.M. L. Rev. 387 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: STATE CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION AND METHODOLOGY, 28 N.M. L. Rev. 199 (1998)

Cited by:
PANEL DISCUSSION: WILL THE BRENNAN LEGACY ENDURE?, 43 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 177 (1999)
Cited by:
43 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 177 p.177

Cited by:
NOTE: WELCOME TO CALIFORNIA, TOM JOAD: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON SAENZ V. ROE STIRRING THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES CLAUSE FROM ITS SLAUGHTER-HOUSE SLUMBER, 58 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 85 (2001)

Cited by:
NOTE: PIETY AND PREJUDICE: FREE EXERCISE EXEMPTION FROM LAWS PROHIBITING SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION, 69 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1176 (1994)

Cited by:
NOTE: RISING ABOVE FACTIONALISM: A MADISONIAN THEORY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, 69 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 963 (1994)

Cited by:
Equal Protection, 66 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1165 (1991)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE FOURTH AMENDMENT IN THE BALANCE: ACCURATELY SETTING THE SCALES THROUGH THE LEAST INTRUSIVE ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS., 63 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1173 (1988)
Cited by:
63 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1173 p.1185

Cited by:
ARTICLE: REVOLUTIONARY CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE ERA OF THE CIVIL WAR AND RECONSTRUCTION., 61 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 863 (1986)
Cited by:
61 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 863 p.889

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE BILL OF RIGHTS AND THE STATES: THE REVIVAL OF STATE CONSTITUTIONS AS GUARDIANS OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS., 61 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 535 (1986)
Cited by:
61 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 535 p.537

Cited by:
ARTICLE: SECTION 1983 AND FEDERAL PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS -- WILL THE STATUTE REMAIN ALIVE OF FADE AWAY?, 60 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1 (1985)
Cited by:
60 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1 p.3

Cited by:
54 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 723
Cited by:
54 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 723 p.732

Cited by:
36 Nat. Resources J. 59
Cited by:
36 Nat. Resources J. 59 p.61

Cited by:
FOREWORD: PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE: A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS RESOLVED, 12 ND J. L. Ethics & Pub Pol'y 369 (1998)

Cited by:
NOTE: SJC Steers Off Course: DUI Breath Test Refusals Inadmissible, 28 New Eng.L. Rev. 1169 (1994)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: "We are a Religious People, Whose Institutions Pre-suppose a Supreme Being", 5 Nexus J. Op. 13 (2000)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE JUDICIAL RESTRAINT AMENDMENT: POPULIST CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN THE SPIRIT OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS, 78 Notre Dame L. Rev. 171 (2002)
Cited by:
78 Notre Dame L. Rev. 171 p.171

Cited by:
ESSAY: WHEN DID THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION CEASE TO BE LAW?, 78 Notre Dame L. Rev. 35 (2002)
Cited by:
78 Notre Dame L. Rev. 35 p.35

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1991: THEORY AND PRACTICE: ARTICLE: Statutory Misinterpretations: A Legal Autopsy, 68 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1095 (1993)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: LAND USE LAW IN THE EARLY REPUBLIC AND THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF THE TAKINGS CLAUSE, 94 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1099 (2000)
Cited by:
94 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1099 p.1099

Cited by:
BOOK REVIEW: BACK TO THE FUTURE? HOW THE BILL OF RIGHTS MIGHT BE ABOUT STRUCTURE AFTER ALL, 93 Nw. U.L. Rev. 977 (1999)
Cited by:
93 Nw. U.L. Rev. 977 p.977

Cited by:
ARTICLE: WHAT'S SO GREAT ABOUT CONSTITUTIONALISM?, 93 Nw. U.L. Rev. 145 (1998)
Cited by:
93 Nw. U.L. Rev. 145 p.145

Cited by:
ARTICLE: ULYSSES AT THE MAST: DEMOCRACY, FEDERALISM, AND THE SIRENS' SONG OF THE SEVENTEENTH AMENDMENT, 91 Nw. U.L. Rev. 500 (1997)
Cited by:
91 Nw. U.L. Rev. 500 p.502

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE "ORIGINAL INTENT" - AS PERCEIVED BY MICHAEL MCCONNELL, 91 Nw. U.L. Rev. 242 (1996)
Cited by:
91 Nw. U.L. Rev. 242 p.260

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE CURIOUS HISTORY OF ATTEMPTS TO SUPPRESS ANTISLAVERY SPEECH, PRESS, AND PETITION IN 1835-37, 89 Nw. U.L. Rev. 785
Cited by:
89 Nw. U.L. Rev. 785 p.791

Cited by:
THE NINTH AMENDMENT, AS PERCEIVED BY RANDY BARNETT, 88 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1508 (1994)
Cited by:
88 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1508 p.1515

Cited by:
THE SECOND ADOPTION OF THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE: RELIGIOUS EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 88 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1106 (1994)
Cited by:
88 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1106 p.1137

Cited by:
LEGAL THEORY: ACTIVIST CENSURES OF ROBERT BORK, 85 Nw. U.L. Rev. 993 (1991)
Cited by:
85 Nw. U.L. Rev. 993 p.1001

Cited by:
CONTINUING COMMENTARY: CONGRESS'S PARAMOUNT ROLE IN SETTING THE SCOPE OF FEDERAL JURISDICTION., 85 Nw. U.L. Rev. 465 (1991)
Cited by:
85 Nw. U.L. Rev. 465 p.475

Cited by:
LEGAL THEORY: TOWARD A GENERAL THEORY OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE., 82 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1115 (1988)

Cited by:
82 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1113, 82 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1113
Cited by:
82 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1113 p.1124

Cited by:
ARTICLE: ADHERENCE TO THE ORIGINAL INTENTIONS IN CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION: THREE OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES., 82 Nw. U.L. Rev. 226 (1988)
Cited by:
82 Nw. U.L. Rev. 226 p.256

Cited by:
ARTICLE: RETHINKING STATE ACTION., 80 Nw. U.L. Rev. 503 (1985)
Cited by:
80 Nw. U.L. Rev. 503 p.514

Cited by:
77 Nw. U.L. Rev. 143
Cited by:
77 Nw. U.L. Rev. 143 p.152

Cited by:
75 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1112
Cited by:
75 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1112 p.1122

Cited by:
74 Nw. U.L. Rev. 311
Cited by:
74 Nw. U.L. Rev. 311 p.345

Cited by:
Deconstructing State Action: The Politics of State Action, 20 Ohio N.U.L. Rev. 847 (1994)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Road to Twining: Reassessing the Disincorporation of the Bill of Rights, 61 Ohio St. L.J. 1457 (2000)
Cited by:
61 Ohio St. L.J. 1457 p.1457

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Lost Compromise: Reassessing the Early Understanding in Court and Congress on Incorporation of the Bill of Rights in the Fourteenth Amendment, 61 Ohio St. L.J. 1051 (2000)
Cited by:
61 Ohio St. L.J. 1051 p.1051

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Violence Against Women and the Persistence of Privacy, 61 Ohio St. L.J. 1 (2000)
Cited by:
61 Ohio St. L.J. 1 p.1

Cited by:
Punitive Damages, 51 Ohio St. L.J. 1031 (1991)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: A Survey of Religious Liberty in the United States., 47 Ohio St. L.J. 409 (1986)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Fourteenth Amendment as Political Compromise -- Section One in the Joint Committee on Reconstruction., 45 Ohio St. L.J. 933 (1984)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Incorporation of the Bill of Rights: A Reply to Michael Curtis' Response., 44 Ohio St. L.J. 1 (1983)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: God Versus Caesar: Free Exercise, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and Conscience, 23 Okla. City U.L. Rev. 929 (1998)

Cited by:
COMMENT: Oklahoma Constitutional Law: The Future of the Fourth Amendment in Oklahoma High Schools, 53 Okla. L. Rev. 681 (2000)
Cited by:
53 Okla. L. Rev. 681 p.681

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Constitution as Based on the Consent of the Governed - Or, Should We Have an Unwritten Constitution?, 80 Or. L. Rev. 1245 (2001)
Cited by:
80 Or. L. Rev. 1245 p.1245

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Logic of Legal Conflict: The Perplexing Combination of Formalism and Anti-Formalism in Adjudication of Conflicting Legal Norms, 80 Or. L. Rev. 447 (2001)
Cited by:
80 Or. L. Rev. 447 p.447

Cited by:
SPEECH: The Frank Nash Inaugural Lecture Under Construction: The Constitution and the Missouri Controversy, 77 Or. L. Rev. 381 (1998)

Cited by:
BOOK REVIEW: Hans Linde's ConstitutionalismIntellect and Craft: The Contributions of Justice Hans Linde to American Constitutionalism. Edited by Robert F. Nagel. Westview Press, Inc. 1995. Pp. xiv, 318. $ 56.00, 74 Or. L. Rev. 1413 (1995)

Cited by:
COMMENT: The New York Death Penalty: Are Murderers in Your County Excluded?, 17 Pace L. Rev. 273 (1996)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Thurgood Marshall and the Holy Grail-The Due Process Jurisprudence of a Consummate Jurist, 26 Pepp. L. Rev. 289 (1999)

Cited by:
Article: Race, Religion, Gender, and Interstate Federalism: Some Notes from History, 16 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 19 (1996)

Cited by:
NOTE: SPECIAL EDUCATION FOR GIFTED CHILDREN: ANSWERING THE "RIGHT" QUESTION, 15 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 103 (1995)

Cited by:
Article: When Tribes Sue States: how "Federal Indian Law" offers an opportunity to clarify sovereign immunity jurisprudence, 14 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 401 (1994)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Evolution, the Supreme Court, and the Destruction of Constitutional Jurisprudence, 13 Regent U.L. Rev. 513 (2000)

Cited by:
SUMARIO: Un analisis del derecho a confrontacion puertorriqueno y la constitucionalidad de las Reglas 37 y 39 de Evidencia segun enmendadas por la Ley 42 del 7 de junio de 1988, 37 Rev. D.P. 25 (1998)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: Separation of Powers in State Constitutional Law  The Positivist Revolution That Wasn't: Constitutional Universalism in the States, 4 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 109 (1998)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: Separation of Powers in State Constitutional Law  The Relevance of Federal Norms for State Separation of Powers, 4 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 51 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Some Notes on the Establishment Clause, 2 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 1 (1996)

Cited by:
ARTICLES PREPARED FOR AND PRESENTED AT THE RUTGERS COMPUTER AND TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL'S SYMPOSIUM: E-COMMERCE IN THE DIGITAL MILLENNIUM: THE LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS OF THE DMCA AND BUSINESS METHOD PATENTS: The Digital Millennium Copyright Act: Disabusing the Notion of a Constitutional Moment +, 27 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 267 (2001)

Cited by:
NOTE: Federalism and Religious Liberty: Were Church and State Meant to be Separate?, 2 Rutgers J. Law & Relig. 5 (2000)

Cited by:
ELEVENTH ANNUAL ISSUE ON STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: FOREWORD: THE MORAL COMPASS OF STATE CONSTITUTIONALISM, 30 Rutgers L.J. 849 (1999)
Cited by:
30 Rutgers L.J. 849 p.849

Cited by:
ARTICLE: How the Conservatives Canonized Brown V. Board of Education, 52 Rutgers L. Rev. 383 (2000)
Cited by:
52 Rutgers L. Rev. 383 p.383

Cited by:
JUDGING WITHOUT JUDGMENT: CONSTITUTIONAL IRRELEVANCIES AND THE DEMISE OF DIALOGUE *, 46 Rutgers L. Rev. 1473 (1994)

Cited by:
NOTE: SOME THOUGHTS ON THE PUZZLE OF STATE ACTION, 68 S. Cal. L. Rev. 663 (1995)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: UNDERSTANDING THE NINETEENTH CENTURY CONTRACT CLAUSE: THE ROLE OF THE PROPERTY-PRIVILEGE DISTINCTION AND "TAKINGS" CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE., 60 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1 (1986)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM ISSUE: COMMENT: NOTICE AND FREEDOM OF CONTRACT IN THE LAW OF SERVITUDES., 55 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1353 (1982)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: IT'S NOT MY FAULT, THE DEVIL MADE ME DO IT: ATTEMPTING TO IMPOSE TORT LIABILITY ON PUBLISHERS, PRODUCERS, AND ARTISTS FOR INJURIES ALLEGEDLY "INSPIRED" BY MEDIA SPEECH, 18 S. Ill. U. L. J. 417 (1994)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: UNFOLDING THE LAW OF DOUBLE JEOPARDY, 44 S.C. L. Rev. 411 (1993)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: DEFENDING FREEDOM OF SPEECH: THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF ANTI-PAPARAZZI LEGISLATION, 44 S.D. L. Rev. 275 (1999)

Cited by:
CASENOTE: BAEHR v. LEWIN: "THE SACRIFICE" SAME-SEX MARRIAGES AND THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION, PRIVACY AND DUE PROCESS, 25 S.U. L. Rev. 253 (1998)

Cited by:
COMMENT: Temporal Units of Prosecution and Continuous Acts: Judicial and Constitutional Limitations *, 36 San Diego L. Rev. 195 (1999)

Cited by:
Casebook Review: A Constitutional Law Casebook for the 21st Century: A Critical Essay on Cohen and Varat, 21 Seattle Univ. L. R. 859 (1998)

Cited by:
CASENOTE: ARTICLE I, PARAGRAPH 1 - Equal Protection - Abortion - New Jersey Parental Notification For Abortion Act Violates State Constitutional Guarantee Of Fundamental Right - Planned Parenthood of Central New Jersey v. Farmer, 762 A.2d 620 (N.J. 2000)., 11 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 495 (2001)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE INVINCIBILITY OF CONSTITUTIONAL ERROR: THE REHNQUIST COURt'S STATES' RIGHTS ASSAULT ON FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, 11 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 259 (2001)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES CLAUSE: MICHAEL PERRY'S JUSTIFICATION FOR JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR ROBERT BORK'S CONSTITUTIONAL INKBLOT?, 10 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 321 (2000)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE OTHER DOUBLE STANDARD: COMMUNITARIANISM, FEDERALISM, AND AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 7 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 69 (1996)

Cited by:
COMMENTS: THE 1990 CLEAN AIR ACT AMENDMENTS AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE SELF-INCRIMINATION CLAUSE: ARE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERS RISKING CRIMINAL LIABILITY?, 5 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 967 (1995)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Supreme Court's IOLTA Decision: Of Dogs, Mangers, and the Ghost of Mrs. Frothingham, 30 Seton Hall L. Rev. 846 (2000)
Cited by:
30 Seton Hall L. Rev. 846 p.846

Cited by:
An Originalist's Evaluation of Modern Takings Jurisprudence, 26 Seton Hall L. Rev. 317 (1995)

Cited by:
NOTE: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Confessions - Waiver of Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Held Invalid Due to Police Failure to Inform Suspect of Attorney's Attempt to Contact Him - State v. Reed, 133 N.J. 237, 627 A.2d 630 (1993)., 25 Seton Hall L. Rev. 353 (1994)

Cited by:
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - First Amendment - EstablishmentClause Prohibits State-Sponsored Invocations at Public School Graduation Ceremonies - Lee v. Weisman, 112 S. Ct. 2649 (1992)., 23 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1096 (1993)

Cited by:
IDENTIFYING, PROTECTING AND PRESERVING INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS: TRADITIONAL FEDERAL COURT FUNCTIONS, 23 Seton Hall L. Rev. 821 (1993)

Cited by:
COMMENT: Take Care of Me When I Am Dead: An Examination of American Church-State Development and the Future of American Religious Liberty, 49 SMU L. Rev. 1579 (1996)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: FEDERALISM: THE BATTLE RECOMMENCES: CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN MARSHALL AND FEDERALISM, 16 St. John's J.L. Comm. 351 (2002)

Cited by:
NOTE: SACRIFICIAL RIGHTS: THE CONFLICT BETWEEN FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION AND ANIMAL RIGHTS, 9 St. John's J.L. Comm. 835 (1994)

Cited by:
COMMENT: SANTA FE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. DOE: ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE CHAOS ON THE HIGH SCHOOL GRIDIRON, 75 St. John's L. Rev. 137 (2001)
Cited by:
75 St. John's L. Rev. 137 p.137

Cited by:
COMMENT: UNITED STATES V. BALSYS: DENYING A SUSPECTED WAR CRIMINAL THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION, 73 St. John's L. Rev. 589 (1999)
Cited by:
73 St. John's L. Rev. 589 p.589

Cited by:
CHILDRESS LECTURE: FREE-STANDING DUE PROCESS AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: THE SUPREME COURT'S SEARCH FOR INTERPRETIVE GUIDELINES, 45 St. Louis U. L.J. 303 (2001)
Cited by:
45 St. Louis U. L.J. 303 p.303

Cited by:
ARTICLES AND ESSAYS: IS AMERICA A SYSTEMATIC VIOLATOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE?*, 44 St. Louis U. L.J. 999 (2000)
Cited by:
44 St. Louis U. L.J. 999 p.999

Cited by:
LEGAL COMMENTARY: "CATCHALL" PRISON RULES AND THE COURTS: A STUDY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF PRISON JUSTICE, 14 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 153 (1994)

Cited by:
FEDERALISM IN THE POST-COLD WAR ERA: FEDERALISM IN THE UNITED STATES: BASIC ELEMENTS AND CHANCES FOR SURVIVAL, 1995 St. Louis-Warsaw Trans'l 121 (1995)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: BEYOND RFRA: FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION COMES OF AGE IN THE STATE COURTS, 10 St. Thomas L. Rev. 235 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: State and Local Foreign Policy Initiatives and Free Speech: The First Amendment as an Instrument of Federalism, 35 Stan. J Int'l L. 1 (1999)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: The Right to Keep and Bear Arms: A Right to Self-Defense Against Criminals and Despots, 8 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev 25 (1997)

Cited by:
BOOK REVIEW: Rights Talk in the Past TenseThe American Language of Rights. By Richard A. Primus. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, 1999. xiv + 262 pp. $ 54.95., 52 Stan. L. Rev. 1865 (2000)

Cited by:
NOTE: Answering Justice Thomas in Saenz: Granting the Privileges or Immunities Clause Full Citizenship Within the Fourteenth Amendment, 52 Stan. L. Rev. 709 (2000)

Cited by:
RESPONSE ESSAY: The Political Question of PresidentialSuccession, 48 Stan. L. Rev. 155 (1995)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Demodeling Habeas., 45 Stan. L. Rev. 575 (1993)
Cited by:
45 Stan. L. Rev. 575 p.606
45 Stan. L. Rev. 575 p.623

Cited by:
ESSAY: "Interpreting" the Constitution: Posner on Bork., 44 Stan. L. Rev. 1019 (1992)

Cited by:
29 Stan. L. Rev. 1191
Cited by:
29 Stan. L. Rev. 1191 p.1199

Cited by:
29 Stan. L. Rev. 663
Cited by:
29 Stan. L. Rev. 663 p.691

Cited by:
SECTION II: DEVELOPING ANALYTICAL ABILITIES: Understanding the Process of Judicial Policymaking Through Case Analysis *, 29 Stetson L. Rev. 1155 (2000)

Cited by:
BEST STAFF COMPETITION PIECE: BEST STAFF COMPETITION PIECE+ Constitutional Law - Public Fora Doctrine Blocks Candidate Access to Government-Broadcast Political Debate - Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes, 118 S. Ct. 1633 (1998), 32 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 823 (1999)
Cited by:
32 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 823 p.823

Cited by:
ARTICLE: PROTECTING SPEECH FROM PRIVATE ABRIDGEMENT: INTRODUCING THE TORT OF SUPPRESSION, 25 Sw. U. L. Rev. 223 (1996)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: BRENNAN'S STATE CONSTITUTIONAL ERA TWENTY-FIVE YEARS LATER - THE HISTORY, THE PRESENT, AND THE STATE CONSTITUTIONAL WALL, 73 Temple L. Rev. 1031 (2000)

Cited by:
CASE NOTE: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - The Supreme Court's Misapplication of Public Forum Doctrine Creates Governmental Veto of Political Speech by Ballot-Qualified Candidates - Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes, 523 U.S. 666 (1998)., 73 Temple L. Rev. 331 (2000)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: WHEN FEDERAL LAW IS ALSO STATE LAW: THE IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW METHODOLOGY OF FOOTNOTE SEVEN IN COMMONWEALTH V. MATOS   n1, 72 Temple L. Rev. 561 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE; THE HISTORY, DEVELOPMENT, AND INTERPRETATION OF THE MARYLAND DECLARATION OF RIGHTS *, 71 Temple L. Rev. 637 (1998)

Cited by:
EMERGING ISSUES IN STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: ARTICLE: THE HISTORY, DEVELOPMENT, AND INTERPRETATION OF THE MARYLAND DECLARATION OF RIGHTS This article has been republished under a new citation. Please see 71 Temple L. Rev. 637 for the republished article., 70 Temple L. Rev. 945 (1997)

Cited by:
EMERGING ISSUES IN STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: ARTICLE: STATE CONSTITUTIONS: PURPOSE AND FUNCTION *, 69 Temple L. Rev. 989 (1996)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: EQUAL PROTECTION PRINCIPLES AND THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE: EQUAL PARTICIPATION IN THE COMMUNITY AS THE CENTRAL LINK, 69 Temple L. Rev. 95 (1996)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: JUDICIAL SELECTION IN THE PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF PENNSYLVANIA: HERE THE PEOPLE RULE?, 68 Temple L. Rev. 1079 (1995)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE FREE EXERCISE RIGHTS OF PREGNANT WOMEN WHO REFUSE MEDICAL TREATMENT, 69 Tenn. L. Rev. 563 (2002)
Cited by:
69 Tenn. L. Rev. 563 p.563

Cited by:
COMMENT: Tennessee Judicial Activism: Renaissance of Federalism, 49 Tenn. L. Rev. 135 (1981)
Cited by:
49 Tenn. L. Rev. 135 p.135

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Self-Incrimination Clause and Administrative Law, 39 Tenn. L. Rev. 207 (1972)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Our Nonuniform Constitution: Geographical Variations of Constitutional Requirements in the Aid of Community, 77 Tex. L. Rev. 1129 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Making the Fifth: The Constitutionalization of American Self-Incrimination Doctrine, 1791-1903, 77 Tex. L. Rev. 825 (1999)
Cited by:
77 Tex. L. Rev. 825 p.837

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Southern Character, Confederate Nationalism, and the Interpretation of State Constitutions: A Case Study in Constitutional Argument, 76 Tex. L. Rev. 1219 (1998)
Cited by:
76 Tex. L. Rev. 1219 p.1278

Cited by:
ARTICLE: JUDICIAL MANIPULATION OF THE COMMERCE CLAUSE, 74 Tex. L. Rev. 695 (1996)
Cited by:
74 Tex. L. Rev. 695 p.706

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM ON THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION: Why Bother with State Bills of Rights? *, 68 Tex. L. Rev. 1573 (1990)
Cited by:
68 Tex. L. Rev. 1573 p.1575

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM ON THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION: The New Federalism: Judicial Legislation by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals?, 68 Tex. L. Rev. 1481 (1990)
Cited by:
68 Tex. L. Rev. 1481 p.1509

Cited by:
ARTICLE: "Constitutional Theory": The Attempted Justification for the Supreme Court's Liberal Political Program., 65 Tex. L. Rev. 789 (1987)
Cited by:
65 Tex. L. Rev. 789 p.793

Cited by:
NOTE: Unenumerated Rights Clauses in State Constitutions. *, 63 Tex. L. Rev. 1321 (1985)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: THE EMERGENCE OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: State Constitutional Law: American Lessons for Australian Adventures., 63 Tex. L. Rev. 1225 (1985)
Cited by:
63 Tex. L. Rev. 1225 p.1231

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: THE EMERGENCE OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: State Constitutionalism: Both Liberal and Conservative., 63 Tex. L. Rev. 1081 (1985)
Cited by:
63 Tex. L. Rev. 1081 p.1083

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: THE EMERGENCE OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: Adequate and Independent State Grounds as a Means of Balancing the Relationship Between State and Federal Courts., 63 Tex. L. Rev. 977 (1985)
Cited by:
63 Tex. L. Rev. 977 p.979

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Ends of Second Amendment Jurisprudence: Firearms Disabilities and Domestic Violence Restraining Orders, 4 Tex. Rev. Law & Pol. 157 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Reviving the Privileges or Immunities Clause To Redress the Balance Among States, Individuals, and the Federal Government, 3 Tex. Rev. Law & Pol. 1 (1998)

Cited by:
NOTE: Cleveland, School Choice, and "Laws Respecting an Establishment of Religion", 2 Tex. Rev. Law & Pol. 166 (1997)

Cited by:
COMMENT: A CONSTITUTIONAL MOSH PIT: THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, SUSPICIONLESS SEARCHES, AND THE TOUGHEST PUBLIC SCHOOL DRUG TESTING POLICY IN AMERICA, 33 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 151 (2001)
Cited by:
33 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 151 p.151

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE ROOTS OF THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION: SETTLEMENT TO STATEHOOD, 26 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 1089 (1995)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Common Ground: Robert Jackson, Antonin Scalia, and a Power Theory of the First Amendment, 75 Tul. L. Rev. 251 (2000)
Cited by:
75 Tul. L. Rev. 251 p.251

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Before Lochner - Diversity Jurisdiction and the Development of General Constitutional Law, 74 Tul. L. Rev. 1263 (2000)
Cited by:
74 Tul. L. Rev. 1263 p.1263

Cited by:
ARTICLE: STORM ON THE CONSTITUTION: THE FIRST DEPORTATION LAW, 10 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 63 (2002)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN PERSONAL DATA: THE EU PRODS THE U.S. AND CONTROVERSY CONTINUES, 9 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 391 (2002)

Cited by:
CASENOTE: Fifth Amendment Rights of a Resident Alien After Balsys, 6 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 163 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Decline of Negative Implication Jurisprudence: Procedural Fairness in Prison Discipline After Sandin v. Conner, 32 Tulsa L.J. 39 (1996)

Cited by:
Article: SUPREME COURT SUPERSTARS: THE TEN GREATEST JUSTICES, 31 Tulsa L.J. 93 (1995)

Cited by:
NOTE: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-Gender Equality and Single-Sex Education. United States v. Virginia, 116 S. Ct. 2264 (1996)., 20 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 191 (1997)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: PRESERVED OR PICKLED?: THE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY AFTER THE MERGER OF LAW AND EQUITY IN MARYLAND, 26 U. Balt. L. Rev. 301 (1997)
Cited by:
26 U. Balt. L. Rev. 301 p.301

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Taking Notes: Subpoenas and Just Compensation, 66 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1081 (1999)
Cited by:
66 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1081 p.1086

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Constitution in Congress: Substantive Issues in the First Congress, 1789-1791., 61 U. Chi. L. Rev. 775 (1994)

Cited by:
KEYNOTE ADDRESS: The Bill of Rights: A Century of Progress., 59 U. Chi. L. Rev. 13 (1992)
Cited by:
59 U. Chi. L. Rev. 13 p.19

Cited by:
ARTICLES: Some New World Lessons for the Old World, 58 U. Chi. L. Rev. 483 (1991)
Cited by:
58 U. Chi. L. Rev. 483 p.489

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Common Law Powers of Federal Courts., 52 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1 (1985)
Cited by:
52 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1 p.63

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Constitution in the Supreme Court: State and Congressional Powers, 1801-1835, 49 U. Chi. L. Rev. 887 (1982)
Cited by:
49 U. Chi. L. Rev. 887 p.895

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Constitution in the Supreme Court: The Powers of the Federal Courts, 1801-1835, 49 U. Chi. L. Rev. 646 (1982)
Cited by:
49 U. Chi. L. Rev. 646 p.648

Cited by:
48 U. Chi. L. Rev. 819
Cited by:
48 U. Chi. L. Rev. 819 p.871

Cited by:
42 U. Chi. L. Rev. 86
Cited by:
42 U. Chi. L. Rev. 86 p.138

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Did He or Didn't He? The Effect of Dickerson on the Post-Waiver Invocation Equation, 69 U. Cin. L. Rev. 863 (2001)
Cited by:
69 U. Cin. L. Rev. 863 p.863

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE NEW MAJORITARIANISM*, 69 U. Cin. L. Rev. 107 (2000)
Cited by:
69 U. Cin. L. Rev. 107 p.107

Cited by:
ARTICLES: INCORPORATION OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS: AKHIL AMAR'S WISHING WELL, 62 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1 (1993)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: PERSPECTIVES ON NATURAL LAW: Natural Law and Judicial Review: Reflections of an Earthbound Lawyer, 61 U. Cin. L. Rev. 5 (1992)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: A JUDICIAL JANUS: MEYER V. NEBRASKA IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE, 57 U. Cin. L. Rev. 125 (1988)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE CONSTITUTION IN PROTECTIVE CUSTODY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE RIGHTS OF PROTECTIVE CUSTODY INMATES, 56 U. Cin. L. Rev. 91 (1987)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: BEYOND PRIVACY, BEYOND PROBABLE CAUSE, BEYOND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT: NEW STRATEGIES FOR FIGHTING PRETEXT ARRESTS, 69 U. Colo. L. Rev. 693 (1998)

Cited by:
IRA C. ROTHGERBER, JR. CONFERENCE ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: GUARANTEEING A REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT: THE CENTRAL MEANING OF REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT: POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY, MAJORITY RULE, AND THE DENOMINATOR PROBLEM., 65 U. Colo. L. Rev. 749 (1994)

Cited by:
COMMENTS: MATERNAL SUBSTANCE ABUSE: DOES OHIO HAVE AN ANSWER?, 17 U. Dayton L. Rev. 1019 (1992)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Environmental Justice and Indian Tribes: The Double-Edged Tomahawk of Applying Civil Rights Laws in Indian Country, 76 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 721 (1999)

Cited by:
CASENOTE: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - The Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause Applies to Drug Related Forfeitures of Property to the United States Under 21 U.S.C. 881(a)(4) and (7). Austin v. United States, 113 S. Ct. 2801 (1993)., 72 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 211 (1994)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS AND INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS: A COMMENT ON PROFESSOR TRIBE'S CRITIQUE OF THE MODERN COURT'S TREATMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL LIBERTY, 2001 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1159 (2001)
Cited by:
2001 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1159 p.1159

Cited by:
ARTICLE: FORFEITURE OF UNIMPROVED LAND IN THE EARLY REPUBLIC, 1997 U. Ill. L. Rev. 435 (1997)
Cited by:
1997 U. Ill. L. Rev. 435 p.439

Cited by:
NOTE: SPEAK OF THE DEVIL: FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF IMMORAL CONDUCT, 1992 U. Ill. L. Rev. 879 (1992)

Cited by:
ESSAY ON THE BILL OF RIGHTS: THE "SIXTY SOMETHING" ANNIVERSARY OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS, 1992 U. Ill. L. Rev. 445 (1992)
Cited by:
1992 U. Ill. L. Rev. 445 p.450

Cited by:
NOTE: THE PINOCCHIO DEFENSE WITNESS IMPEACHMENT EXCEPTION TO THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE: COMBATTING A DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO USE WITH IMPUNITY THE PERJURIOUS TESTIMONY OF DEFENSE WITNESSES, 1990 U. Ill. L. Rev. 375 (1990)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: ON ROLLERCOASTERS, SUBMARINES, AND JUDICIAL SHIPWRECKS: ACOUSTIC SEPARATION AND THE GOOD FAITH EXCEPTION TO THE FOURTH AMENDMENT EXCLUSIONARY RULE, 1989 U. Ill. L. Rev. 941 (1989)
Cited by:
1989 U. Ill. L. Rev. 941 p.950

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE PARAMETERS OF CONSTITUTIONAL RECONSTRUCTION: SLAUGHTER-HOUSE, CRUIKSHANK, AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 1984 U. Ill. L. Rev. 739 (1984)
Cited by:
1984 U. Ill. L. Rev. 739 p.749

Cited by:
Group Suspicion: The Key to Evaluating Student Drug Testing *, 48 U. Kan. L. Rev. 637 (2000)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: AN UNWELCOME STRANGER: CONGRESSIONAL INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS POWER AND FEDERALISM, 44 U. Kan. L. Rev. 61 (1995)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Right to Refuse Mental Health Treatment: A First Amendment Perspective *, 44 U. Miami L. Rev. 1 (1989)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM ON RICHARD EPSTEIN'S TAKINGS: PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THE POWER OF EMINENT DOMAIN: Proceedings of the Conference on Takings of Property and the Constitution, 41 U. Miami L. Rev. 49 (1986)

Cited by:
NOTE: Recognizing the Right of Terminally-Ill Mature Minors to Refuse Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment: The Need for Legislative Guidelines to Give Full Effect to Minors' Expanded Rights, 34 U. of Louisville J. of Fam. L. 421 (1996)

Cited by:
COMMENTS: ESTABLISHING A BUFFER ZONE: THE PROPER BALANCE BETWEEN THE FIRST AMENDMENT RELIGION CLAUSES IN THE CONTEXT OF NEUTRAL ZONING REGULATIONS, 149 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1507 (2001)
Cited by:
149 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1507 p.1507

Cited by:
COMMENTS: NICHOLS V. UNITED STATES, THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL,AND COLLATERAL SENTENCE ENHANCEMENT:IN SEARCH OF A RATIONALE, 144 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1189 (1996)

Cited by:
COMMENTS: PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT LOCHNER: TOWARD A TAKINGS JURISPRUDENCE UNCORRUPTED BY SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS., 142 U. Pa. L. Rev. 837 (1993)

Cited by:
COMMENTS: FINDING A RIGHT IN STATE CONSTITUTIONS FOR COMMUNITY TREATMENT OF THE MENTALLY ILL., 142 U. Pa. L. Rev. 739 (1993)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: BELONGING, PROTECTION AND EQUALITY: THE NEGLECTED CITIZENSHIP CLAUSE AND THE LIMITS OF FEDERALISM, 62 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 281 (2000)
Cited by:
62 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 281 p.281

Cited by:
ARTICLE: STATE ACTION AND THE DUE PROCESS OF SELF-HELP; FLAGG BROS. REDUX, 62 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 1 (2000)
Cited by:
62 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 1 p.1

Cited by:
A BICENTENNIAL CELEBRATION OF THE CONSTITUTION: THE THIRD CIRCUIT JUDICIAL CONFERENCE IN PHILADELPHIA: PROSPECTIVE VIEW. TOWARD A NEW PARTNERSHIP: THE FUTURE RELATIONSHIP OF FEDERAL AND STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. *, 49 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 729 (1988)

Cited by:
COMMENTARY ON AKHIL REED AMAR'S THE BILL OF RIGHTS: CREATION AND RECONSTRUCTION "NO WORD IS AN ISLAND": TEXTUALISM AND AESTHETICS IN AKHIL REED AMAR'S THE BILL OF RIGHTS *, 33 U. Rich. L. Rev. 537 (1999)
Cited by:
33 U. Rich. L. Rev. 537 p.537

Cited by:
COMMENTARY ON AKHIL REED AMAR'S THE BILL OF RIGHTS: CREATION AND RECONSTRUCTION TWO MOVEMENTS OF A CONSTITUTIONAL SYMPHONY: AKHIL REED AMAR'S THE BILL OF RIGHTS, 33 U. Rich. L. Rev. 485 (1999)
Cited by:
33 U. Rich. L. Rev. 485 p.485

Cited by:
COMMENTARY ON AKHIL REED AMAR'S THE BILL OF RIGHTS: CREATION AND RECONSTRUCTION THE CONSTITUTION AS A WHOLE: A PARTIAL POLITICAL SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE, 33 U. Rich. L. Rev. 343 (1999)
Cited by:
33 U. Rich. L. Rev. 343 p.343

Cited by:
COMMENTARY ON AKHIL REED AMAR'S THE BILL OF RIGHTS: CREATION AND RECONSTRUCTION LONG LIVE THE BILL OF RIGHTS! LONG LIVE AKHIL REED AMAR'S THE BILL OF RIGHTS!, 33 U. Rich. L. Rev. 313 (1999)
Cited by:
33 U. Rich. L. Rev. 313 p.313

Cited by:
COMMENTARY ON AKHIL REED AMAR'S THE BILL OF RIGHTS: CREATION AND RECONSTRUCTION: REFINED INCORPORATION AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 33 U. Rich. L. Rev. 289 (1999)
Cited by:
33 U. Rich. L. Rev. 289 p.289

Cited by:
ARTICLE: A NEW FEDERALISM FOR INDIAN TRIBES: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND TRIBES IN LIGHT OF OUR FEDERALISM AND REPUBLICAN DEMOCRACY, 25 U. Tol. L. Rev. 617 (1994)

Cited by:
THE LAW OF THE FEDERATION: IMAGES OF LAW, LAWYERS, AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN "STAR TREK: THE NEXT GENERATION", 24 U. Tol. L. Rev. 43 (1992)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: A Whipsaw Cuts Both Ways: The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination in an International Context, 45 UCLA L. Rev. 1201 (1998)
Cited by:
45 UCLA L. Rev. 1201 p.1211

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The 1837 Killing of Elijah Lovejoy by an Anti-Abolition Mob: Free Speech, Mobs, Republican Government, and the Privileges of American Citizens, 44 UCLA L. Rev. 1109 (1997)
Cited by:
44 UCLA L. Rev. 1109 p.1117

Cited by:
ARTICLE: POLITICAL UNITY AND THE POWERS OF GOVERNMENT., 41 UCLA L. Rev. 1297 (1994)
Cited by:
41 UCLA L. Rev. 1297 p.1333

Cited by:
SPECIAL ISSUE: THE RODNEY KING TRIALS: CIVIL RIGHTS PROSECUTIONS AND DOUBLE JEOPARDY: THE RODNEY KING TRIALS AND THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE: SOME OBSERVATIONS ON ORIGINAL MEANING AND THE ACLU's SCHIZOPHRENIC VIEWS OF THE DUAL SOVEREIGN DOCTRINE, 41 UCLA L. Rev. 693 (1994)

Cited by:
36 UCLA L. Rev. 233, 36 UCLA L. Rev. 233
Cited by:
36 UCLA L. Rev. 233 p.242

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE INFANCY DEFENSE IN THE NEW JUVENILE COURT., 31 UCLA L. Rev. 503 (1984)
Cited by:
31 UCLA L. Rev. 503 p.518

Cited by:
23 UCLA L. Rev. 77
Cited by:
23 UCLA L. Rev. 77 p.79

Cited by:
ARTICLE: DOMINANCE AND DEMOCRACY: THE LEGACY OF WOMAN SUFFRAGE FOR THE VOTING RIGHT, 5 UCLA Women's L.J. 103 (1994)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Public Use or Public Abuse, 68 UMKC L. Rev. 49 (1999)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: PRESUMED INDIGENT: THE EFFECT OF BANKRUPTCY ON A DEBTOR'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO CRIMINAL DEFENSE COUNSEL, 62 UMKC L. Rev. 277 (1993)

Cited by:
LEARY LECTURE: The Second Amendment: A Case Study in Constitutional Interpretation, 2001 Utah L. Rev. 889 (2001)
Cited by:
2001 Utah L. Rev. 889 p.889

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Origins of Regulatory Takings: Setting the Record Straight, 1996 Utah L. Rev. 1211 (1996)

Cited by:
The Mysterious Creation Of Search and Seizure Exclusionary Rules Under State Constitutions: The Utah Example, 1993 Utah L. Rev. 751 (1993)

Cited by:
PRINCIPAL PAPER: Treaties, Self-Execution, and the Public Law Litigation Model, 42 Va. J. Int'l L. 757 (2002)

Cited by:
ESSAY: DISSING STATES?: INVALIDATION OF STATE ACTION DURING THE REHNQUIST ERA, 88 Va. L. Rev. 1301 (2002)
Cited by:
88 Va. L. Rev. 1301 p.1301

Cited by:
ARTICLE: EQUAL PROTECTION INCORPORATION, 88 Va. L. Rev. 951 (2002)
Cited by:
88 Va. L. Rev. 951 p.951

Cited by:
BOOK REVIEW: THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND NEW FORMS OF CIVIL LIABILITY, 88 Va. L. Rev. 919 (2002)
Cited by:
88 Va. L. Rev. 919 p.919

Cited by:
ARTICLE: REDISTRIBUTIVE LITIGATION--JUDICIAL INNOVATION, PRIVATE EXPECTATIONS, AND THE SHADOW OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 88 Va. L. Rev. 789 (2002)
Cited by:
88 Va. L. Rev. 789 p.789

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE ARTICLE III JURY, 87 Va. L. Rev. 587 (2001)
Cited by:
87 Va. L. Rev. 587 p.587

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Substantive Due Process and the Constitutional Text, 83 Va. L. Rev. 493 (1997)
Cited by:
83 Va. L. Rev. 493 p.551

Cited by:
ESSAY: SOME OPINIONS ON THE OPINION CLAUSE, 82 Va. L. Rev. 647 (1996)

Cited by:
NOTE: CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AT THE JUNCTION: THE EMERGENCE OF THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION AND THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE ACT, 81 Va. L. Rev. 1989 (1995)

Cited by:
ESSAY: DISCRIMINATION AND ITS DISCONTENTS, 81 Va. L. Rev. 117 (1995)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: RECONCILING INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND GOVERNMENT INTERESTS: MADISONIAN PRINCIPLES VERSUS SUPREME COURT PRACTICE., 78 Va. L. Rev. 1521 (1992)
Cited by:
78 Va. L. Rev. 1521 p.1522

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE IDEOLOGIES OF FEDERAL COURTS LAW., 74 Va. L. Rev. 1141 (1988)
Cited by:
74 Va. L. Rev. 1141 p.1158

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE WORKING LIFE OF THE MARSHALL COURT, 1815-1835 *, 70 Va. L. Rev. 1 (1984)
Cited by:
70 Va. L. Rev. 1 p.31

Cited by:
NOTE: THE REACH OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE WHEN DOMESTICALLY COMPELLED TESTIMONY MAY BE USED IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY'S COURT, 69 Va. L. Rev. 875 (1983)

Cited by:
SEEGERS LECTURE: Constitutional Redundancies and Clarifying Clauses, 33 Val. U.L. Rev. 1 (1998)
Cited by:
33 Val. U.L. Rev. 1 p.1

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Naked Land Transfers and American Constitutional Development, 53 Vand. L. Rev. 73 (2000)
Cited by:
53 Vand. L. Rev. 73 p.73

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Taking Liberties With the First Amendment: Congress, Section 5, and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 48 Vand. L. Rev. 1539 (1995)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Federalism and Civil Rights: Complementary and Competing Paradigms., 47 Vand. L. Rev. 1251 (1994)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Reflections on the Hart and Wechsler Paradigm., 47 Vand. L. Rev. 953 (1994)

Cited by:
BOOK REVIEW: A Precarious Path: The Bill of Rights After 200 Years, 47 Vand. L. Rev. 757 (1994)

Cited by:
ESSAY: The Ripple Effects of Slaughter-House: A Critique of a Negative Rights View of the Constitution., 43 Vand. L. Rev. 409 (1990)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Challenging the Death Penalty Under State Constitutions., 42 Vand. L. Rev. 1299 (1989)

Cited by:
ESSAY: Federalism, Separation of Powers, and Individual Liberties. *, 40 Vand. L. Rev. 1353 (1987)

Cited by:
Note: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Alibi Instructions and Due Process of Law, 20 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 343 (1998)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: California's Statutory Scheme for Dealing With the Drinking Driver: Imposition of Successive Penalties in Violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause, 23 W. St. U.L. Rev. 361 (1996)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: United States v. Powell: A Relook at the Dual Sovereignty Exception to the Fifth Amendment's Prohibition Against Successive Prosecutions, 22 W. St. U.L. Rev. 219 (1995)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: FEDERALISM AND THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: FEDERALISM, FEDERALIZATION, AND THE POLITICS OF CRIME, 98 W. Va. L. Rev. 789 (1996)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: FEDERALISM AND THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: THE FEDERALISM PENDULUM, 98 W. Va. L. Rev. 771 (1996)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: ORIGINALISM AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 33 Wake Forest L. Rev. 909 (1998)

Cited by:
OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES DEVISE LECTURE SYMPOSIUM: "FREE SPEECH" AND ITS DISCONTENTS: THE REBELLION AGAINST GENERAL PROPOSITIONS AND THE DANGER OF DISCRETION, 31 Wake Forest L. Rev. 419 (1996)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: "A Less Proportion of Idle Proprietors": Madison, Property Rights, and the Abolition of Fee Tail, 58 Wash & Lee L. Rev. 167 (2001)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Guns, Extremists, and the Constitution, 57 Wash & Lee L. Rev. 1095 (2000)
Cited by:
57 Wash & Lee L. Rev. 1095 p.1095

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE ASYMMETRY OF STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY, 76 Wash. L. Rev. 1067 (2001)
Cited by:
76 Wash. L. Rev. 1067 p.1067

Cited by:
ARTICLE: STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, AND DEMOCRATIC ACCOUNTABILITY: IS THERE A CROCODILE IN THE BATHTUB?, 64 Wash. L. Rev. 19 (1989)

Cited by:
RECENT DEVELOPMENT: FEDERALISM, UNIFORMITY, AND THE STATE CONSTITUTION -- State v. Gunwall, 106 Wn. 2d 54, 720 P.2d 808 (1986)., 62 Wash. L. Rev. 569 (1987)

Cited by:
NEW DEAL SYMPOSIUM: THE ACTIVIST LEGACY OF THE NEW DEAL COURT., 59 Wash. L. Rev. 751 (1984)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: LEGISLATIVE RETROACTIVITY, 52 Wash. U. J. Urb. & Contemp. L. 81 (1997)

Cited by:
F. HODGE O'NEAL CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW SYMPOSIUM: THE MODERNIZATION OF FINANCIAL SERVICES LEGISLATION: NOTE: WHEN THE KLAN ADOPTS-A- HIGHWAY: THE WEAKNESSES OF THE PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE EXPOSED, 77 Wash. U. L. Q. 557 (1999)
Cited by:
77 Wash. U. L. Q. 557 p.557

Cited by:
NOTE: APPROACHING THE MILLENNIUM: ARE PENNSYLVANIA'S ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE STATUTES STILL DOING THE JOB?: SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE: JACKSON v. BENSON-THE WALL COMES TUMBLIN' DOWN*, 8 Widener J. Pub. L. 543 (1999)

Cited by:
COMENT: A BLANK CHECK: THE NINTH CIRCUIT'S PRECLUSION OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS INQUIRY IN TAKINGS CASES, 37 Willamette L. Rev. 661 (2001)
Cited by:
37 Willamette L. Rev. 661 p.661

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Pursuing Justice in a Climate of Moral Outrage: An Evaluation of the Rights of the Accused in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 19 Wis. Int'l L.J. 197 (2001)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: STATE-SUPPORTED SPEECH, 1999 Wis. L. Rev. 1119 (1999)
Cited by:
1999 Wis. L. Rev. 1119 p.1142

Cited by:
ADDRESS: THE SHELF LIFE OF JUSTICE HUGO L. BLACK: THE FAIRFIELD LECTURE, 1997 Wis. L. Rev. 1 (1997)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: THE ANTI-FEDERALIST NINTH AMENDMENT AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW., 1990 Wis. L. Rev. 1229 (1990)

Cited by:
1975 Wis. L. Rev. 484
Cited by:
1975 Wis. L. Rev. 484 p.487

Cited by:
BOOK REVIEW: Antebellum Perspectives on Free Speech, 10 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rts. J. 779 (2002)

Cited by:
A STORY FOR ALL SEASONS: AKHIL REED AMAR ON THE BILL OF RIGHTS, 8 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rts. J. 437 (2000)

Cited by:
THE BILL OF RIGHTS, THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, AND THE SEVEN DEADLY SINS OF LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP, 8 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rts. J. 407 (2000)

Cited by:
SEVENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL IN NONARTICLE III PROCEEDINGS: A STUDY IN DYSFUNCTIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY, 4 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rts. J. 407 (1995)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: HOW MUCH GOD IN THE SCHOOLS? *: PUBLIC EDUCATION AND THE PUBLIC GOOD, 4 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rts. J. 277 (1995)

Cited by:
SYMPOSIUM: THE LEGACY OF CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN MARSHALL: THE LIVES OF JOHN MARSHALL, 43 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1399 (2002)
Cited by:
43 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1399 p.1399

Cited by:
THE PEOPLE MADE ME DO IT: CAN THE PEOPLE OF THE STATES INSTRUCT AND COERCE THEIR STATE LEGISLATURES IN THE ARTICLE V CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROCESS?, 41 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1037 (2000)
Cited by:
41 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1037 p.1037

Cited by:
ARTICLE: GAZING INTO THE CRYSTAL BALL: REFLECTIONS ON THE STANDARDS STATE JUDGES SHOULD USE TO ASCERTAIN FEDERAL LAW, 40 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1143 (1999)
Cited by:
40 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1143 p.1143

Cited by:
THE BILL OF RIGHTS AT 200 YEARS: BICENTENNIAL PERSPECTIVE: THE TRIVIALIZATION OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS: ONE HISTORIAN'S VIEW OF HOW THE PURPOSES OF THE FIRST TEN AMENDMENTS HAVE BEEN DEFILED, 31 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 287 (1990)

Cited by:
THE BILL OF RIGHTS AT 200 YEARS: BICENTENNIAL PERSPECTIVE: JAMES MADISON, THE BILL OF RIGHTS, AND THE PROBLEM OF THE STATES, 31 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 267 (1990)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: CONGRESS, THE CONSTITUTION, AND THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT: THE LETTER AND THE SPIRIT OF THE EXCEPTIONS CLAUSE, 24 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 385 (1983)

Cited by:
INDIVIDUAL LIBERTIES CLAIMS: PROMOTING A HEALTHY CONSTITUTION FOR MINNESOTA, 19 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 684 (1993)

Cited by:
BOOK REVIEW: Two Foxes in the Forest of HistoryBruce Ackerman, We the People, vol. II, Transformations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998. Pp. xi, 515. $ 29.95.Akhil Reed Amar, The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1998. Pp. xv, 412. $ 30.00., 11 Yale J.L. & Human. 191 (1999)

Cited by:
NOTE: "No Distinction Would Be Tolerated": Thaddeus Stevens, Disability, and the Original Intent of the Equal Protection Clause, 19 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 265 (2000)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Choosing Equality: Religious Freedom and Educational Opportunity Under Constitutional Federalism, 15 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 113 (1996)

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Setting Incorporationism Straight: A Reinterpretation of the Slaughter-House Cases, 109 Yale L.J. 643 (2000)
Cited by:
109 Yale L.J. 643 p.643

Cited by:
NOTE: The McCulloch Theory of the Fourteenth Amendment: City of Boerne v. Flores and the Original Understanding of Section 5, 109 Yale L.J. 115 (1999)
Cited by:
109 Yale L.J. 115 p.115

Cited by:
BOOK REVIEW: Akhil Amar and the (Premature?) Demise of Criminal Procedure Liberalism, 107 Yale L.J. 2281 (1998)
Cited by:
107 Yale L.J. 2281 p.2293

Cited by:
Article: The Common Law Origins of Constitutionally Compelled Remedies, 107 Yale L.J. 77 (1997)
Cited by:
107 Yale L.J. 77 p.121

Cited by:
Article: "The Foundation of Our "Regulatory Takings' Jurisprudence": The Myth and Meaning of Justice Holmes's Opinion in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 106 Yale L.J. 613 (1996)
Cited by:
106 Yale L.J. 613 p.626

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Substantive Origins of Criminal Procedure, 105 Yale L.J. 393 (1995)
Cited by:
105 Yale L.J. 393 p.419

Cited by:
ARTICLE: On Misreading John Bingham and the Fourteenth Amendment, 103 Yale L.J. 57 (1993)
Cited by:
103 Yale L.J. 57 p.59
103 Yale L.J. 57 p.85

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Reconstructing the Privileges or Immunities Clause., 101 Yale L.J. 1385 (1992)
Cited by:
101 Yale L.J. 1385 p.1393
101 Yale L.J. 1385 p.1465

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment., 101 Yale L.J. 1193 (1992)
Cited by:
101 Yale L.J. 1193 p.1197

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Bill of Rights as a Constitution., 100 Yale L.J. 1131 (1991)
Cited by:
100 Yale L.J. 1131 p.1157

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Whose Constitution?, 100 Yale L.J. 909 (1991)
Cited by:
100 Yale L.J. 909 p.940

Cited by:
COMMENT: The Embarrassing Second Amendment., 99 Yale L.J. 637 (1989)
Cited by:
99 Yale L.J. 637 p.652

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Constitutional Politics/Constitutional Law. *, 99 Yale L.J. 453 (1989)
Cited by:
99 Yale L.J. 453 p.517

Cited by:
ARTICLE: The Supreme Court, the Eleventh Amendment, and State Sovereign Immunity., 98 Yale L.J. 1 (1988)
Cited by:
98 Yale L.J. 1 p.31

Cited by:
ARTICLE: Agon at Agora: Creative Misreadings in the First Amendment Tradition., 95 Yale L.J. 857 (1986)
Cited by:
95 Yale L.J. 857 p.878

Cited by:
NOTE: The Origins and Original Significance of the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment., 94 Yale L.J. 694 (1985)

Cited by:
91 Yale L.J. 1317
Cited by:
91 Yale L.J. 1317 p.1344

Cited by:
86 Yale L.J. 1019
Cited by:
86 Yale L.J. 1019 p.1021

Cited by:
83 Yale L.J. 498
Cited by:
83 Yale L.J. 498 p.516

Cited by:
ARTICLE: An Interpretative Understanding of the Supreme Court (1992)

ALR ANNOTATIONS ( 4 Citing Annotations )

Supreme Court's views as to what constitutes a bill of attainder prohibited by federal constitution, 53 L. Ed. 2d 1273, sec. 1

Supreme Court's views as to what constitutes an ex post facto law prohibited by Federal Constitution, 53 L. Ed. 2d 1146, sec. 1

Comment Note.--What provisions of the Federal Constitution's Bill of Rights are applicable to the states, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1388, sec. 7

Excessive Fines Clause of Eighth Amendment--Supreme Court Cases, 172 A.L.R. Fed. 389, sec. 2(a)

SECONDARY SOURCES ( 6 Citing Sources )

Cited by:
53 A.B.A.J. 1033
Cited by:
53 A.B.A.J. 1033 p.1037

Cited by:
51 A.B.A.J. 665
Cited by:
51 A.B.A.J. 665 p.666

Cited by:
50 A.B.A.J. 139
Cited by:
50 A.B.A.J. 139 p.139

Cited by:
49 A.B.A.J. 645
Cited by:
49 A.B.A.J. 645 p.650

Cited by:
48 A.B.A.J. 922
Cited by:
48 A.B.A.J. 922 p.931

Cited by:
38 A.B.A.J. 277
Cited by:
38 A.B.A.J. 277 p.280