Copyright 2003 SHEPARD'S - 42 Citing references

Cumberland v. Willison, 50 Md. 138, 1878 Md. LEXIS 148, 33 Am. Rep. 304 (1878)

SHEPARD'S(R) Signal: Positive treatment is indicated
Restrictions: Unrestricted
FOCUS(TM) Terms: No FOCUS terms
Print Format: FULL
Citing Ref. Signal: Hidden

PRIOR HISTORY ( 0 citing references )

(CITATION YOU ENTERED):
Cumberland v. Willison, 50 Md. 138, 1878 Md. LEXIS 148, 33 Am. Rep. 304 (1878)

CITING DECISIONS ( 39 citing decisions )

MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
Maryland Port Admin. v. QC Corp., 310 Md. 379, 529 A.2d 829, 1987 Md. LEXIS 274 (1987)
Cited by:
310 Md. 379 p.392
529 A.2d 829 p.835

Cited by:
Goldstein v. Baltimore, 273 Md. 85, 327 A.2d 770, 1974 Md. LEXIS 692 (1974)
Cited by:
273 Md. 85 p.90
327 A.2d 770 p.773

Cited by:
Cumberland v. Turney, 177 Md. 297, 9 A.2d 561, 1939 Md. LEXIS 255 (1939)
Cited by:
177 Md. 297 p.310
9 A.2d 561 p.567

Cited by:
Eisenstein v. Mayor, Counselor & Aldermen of Annapolis, 177 Md. 222, 9 A.2d 224, 1939 Md. LEXIS 246 (1939)
Cited by:
177 Md. 222 p.228
177 Md. 222 p.229
9 A.2d 224 p.227

Cited by:
Baltimore v. Himmelfarb, 172 Md. 628, 192 A. 595, 1937 Md. LEXIS 270 (1937)
Cited by:
172 Md. 628 p.631
192 A. 595 p.597

Cited by:
North Beach v. North Chesapeake Beach Land & Improv. Co., 172 Md. 101, 191 A. 71, 1937 Md. LEXIS 216 (1937)
Cited by:
172 Md. 101 p.121
191 A. 71 p.80

Cited by:
Smith v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 168 Md. 89, 176 A. 642, 1935 Md. LEXIS 131 (1935)
Cited by:
168 Md. 89 p.93
176 A. 642 p.644

Cited by:
KREBS v. STATE RDS. COMM'N, 160 Md. 584, 154 A. 131, 1931 Md. LEXIS 110 (1931)
Cited by:
160 Md. 584 p.588
154 A. 131 p.133

Cited by:
Baltimore v. Baltimore Marine Works, Inc., 152 Md. 367, 136 A. 829, 1927 Md. LEXIS 125 (1927)
Cited by:
152 Md. 367 p.368
136 A. 829 p.829

Cited by:
Dobler v. Baltimore, 151 Md. 154, 134 A. 201, 1926 Md. LEXIS 94 (1926)
Cited by:
151 Md. 154 p.162
134 A. 201 p.204

Followed by:
Baltimore v. Dobler, 140 Md. 634, 118 A. 168, 1922 Md. LEXIS 75 (1922)
Followed by:
140 Md. 634 p.643
118 A. 168 p.171

Followed by:
Taylor v. Baltimore, 130 Md. 133, 99 A. 900, 1917 Md. LEXIS 107, L.R.A. (n.s.) 1917C1046 (1917)
Followed by:
130 Md. 133 p.138
99 A. 900 p.902

Cited by:
Gutowski v. Baltimore, 127 Md. 502, 96 A. 630, 1916 Md. LEXIS 16 (1916)
Cited by:
127 Md. 502 p.509
96 A. 630 p.633

Cited by:
Baltimore v. Bregenzer, 125 Md. 78, 93 A. 425, 1915 Md. LEXIS 197 (1915)
Cited by:
125 Md. 78 p.85
93 A. 425 p.427

Cited by:
Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Kane, 124 Md. 231, 92 A. 532, 1914 Md. LEXIS 26, L.R.A. (n.s.) 1916C433 (1914)
Cited by:
124 Md. 231 p.238
92 A. 532 p.534

Explained by:
Baltimore v. Johnson, 123 Md. 320, 91 A. 156, 1914 Md. LEXIS 126 (1914)
Explained by:
123 Md. 320 p.324
91 A. 156 p.157

Cited by:
Northern C. R. Co. v. Oldenburg & Kelley, Inc., 122 Md. 236, 89 A. 601, 1914 Md. LEXIS 57 (1914)
Cited by:
122 Md. 236 p.248
89 A. 601 p.606

Cited by:
Baltimore v. Garrett, 120 Md. 608, 87 A. 1057, 1913 Md. LEXIS 149 (1913)
Cited by:
120 Md. 608 p.611
87 A. 1057 p.1059

Cited by:
Kent County Comm'rs v. Godwin, 98 Md. 84, 56 A. 478, 1903 Md. LEXIS 207 (1903)
Cited by:
98 Md. 84 p.90
56 A. 478 p.480

Cited by:
Offutt v. Commissioners of Montgomery County, 94 Md. 115, 50 A. 419, 1901 Md. LEXIS 83 (1901)
Cited by:
94 Md. 115 p.123
50 A. 419 p.420

Cited by:
De Lauder v. Commissioners of Baltimore County, 94 Md. 1, 50 A. 427, 1901 Md. LEXIS 87 (1901)
Cited by:
94 Md. 1 p.8
50 A. 427 p.429

Cited by:
Guest v. Commissioners of Church Hill, 90 Md. 689, 45 A. 882, 1900 Md. LEXIS 113 (1900)
Cited by:
90 Md. 689 p.693
45 A. 882 p.883

Cited by:
Garrett v. Lake R. E. R. Co., 79 Md. 277, 29 A. 830, 1894 Md. LEXIS 83, 24 L.R.A. 396 (1894)
Cited by:
79 Md. 277 p.284
29 A. 830 p.832

Cited by:
O'Brien v. Baltimore B. R. Co., 74 Md. 363, 22 A. 141, 1891 Md. LEXIS 76, 13 L.R.A. 126 (1891)
Cited by:
74 Md. 363 p.374
22 A. 141 p.143

Explained by:
Hitchins v. Mayor, etc., of Frostburg, 68 Md. 100, 11 A. 826, 1887 Md. LEXIS 14, 6 Am. St. Rep. 422 (1887)
Explained by:
68 Md. 100 p.110
11 A. 826 p.829

Followed by:
Gregg v. Baltimore, 56 Md. 256, 1881 Md. LEXIS 95 (1881)
Followed by:
56 Md. 256 p.273
Cited by:
56 Md. 256 p.274

MARYLAND

Cited by:
3 Balt. C. Rep. 58
Cited by:
3 Balt. C. Rep. 58 p.62

Cited by:
1 Balt. C. Rep. 483
Cited by:
1 Balt. C. Rep. 483 p.487

Cited by:
1 Balt. C. Rep. 133
Cited by:
1 Balt. C. Rep. 133 p.137

D.C. CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
District of Columbia v. Totten, 55 U.S. App. D.C. 312, 5 F.2d 374, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2660, 55 App. D.C. 312, 40 A.L.R. 1461 (1925)
Cited by:
5 F.2d 374 p.377
5 F.2d 374 p.379

Cited by:
Dana v. Rock C. R. Co., 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 3087, 7 App. D.C. 482 (D.C. Cir. 1896)

MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT

Cited by:
Miles v. Worcester, 154 Mass. 511, 28 N.E. 676, 1891 Mass. LEXIS 173, 26 Am. St. Rep. 264, 13 L.R.A. 841 (1891)
Cited by:
28 N.E. 676 p.677

MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
A. L. Lakey Co. v. Kalamazoo, 138 Mich. 644, 101 N.W. 841, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 911, 110 Am. St. Rep. 338, 67 L.R.A. 931 (1904)
Cited by:
101 N.W. 841 p.843

Cited by:
Vanderlip v. Grand Rapids, 73 Mich. 522, 41 N.W. 677, 1889 Mich. LEXIS 1164, 16 Am. St. Rep. 597, 3 L.R.A. 247 (1889)
Cited by:
41 N.W. 677 p.682

MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
Whitfield v. Carrollton, 50 Mo. App. 98, 1892 Mo. App. LEXIS 289 (1892)

Cited by:
Torpey v. Independence, 24 Mo. App. 288, 1887 Mo. App. LEXIS 183 (1887)

NEW MEXICO SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Coler v. Board of County Comm'rs, 6 N.M. 88, 27 P. 619, 1891 N.M. LEXIS 24 (N.M. 1891)

OHIO COURT OF APPEALS

Cited by:
Lebanon v. Loop, 4 Ohio Op. 480, 20 Ohio Law Abs. 302, 32 N.E.2d 458, 32 N.E. 458, 1935 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1107 (Ohio Ct. App., Warren County 1935)
Cited by:
32 N.E.2d 458 p.461

WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT

Cited by:
Parke v. Seattle, 5 Wash. 1, 31 P. 310, 32 P. 82, 1892 Wash. LEXIS 1, 34 Am. St. Rep. 839, 20 L.R.A. 68 (1892)
Cited by:
32 P. 82 p.89

ANNOTATED STATUTES ( 1 Citing Statute )

Md. Const. art. III, @ 40

LAW REVIEWS AND PERIODICALS ( 2 Citing References )

Cited by:
4 Md. L. Rev. 1
Cited by:
4 Md. L. Rev. 1 p.229

Cited by:
ARTICLE: NORMATIVE THEORY AND LEGAL DOCTRINE IN AMERICAN NUISANCE LAW: 1850-1920. +, 59 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1101 (1986)