Papenfuse: Research Notes and Documents for
Barron v Baltimore, 32 U. S. 243

barron-0247   Enlarge and print image (1M)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>

clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Papenfuse: Research Notes and Documents for
Barron v Baltimore, 32 U. S. 243

barron-0247   Enlarge and print image (1M)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>

Barren's Wharf 11 long. The room was described by the New York Tribune as "a potato hole of a place ... a queer room of small dimensions and shaped overhead like a quarter section of a pumpkin shell."30 Others viewed it more kindly. A visitor in the late 1820s was "impressed by the Court's simplicity." The justices sat at a long table and the lawyers sat on cushioned chairs; spectators were given comfortable sofas. Opposite the justices was a rep- lica of the Goddess of Justice.31 To argue the case, the State of Maryland sent one of its own legal giants, Roger Brooke Taney. Taney would soon become attorney general* under President Andrew Jackson and would eventually succeed Marshall as chief justice. In 1857 Taney would write the shattering Dred Scott decision, which triggered the Civil War (see Chapter 2). But in 1833 Roger Taney was in Annapolis as Maryland's attorney general. One of his assist- ants, John Scott, had been primarily responsible for arguing the case at the trial court, with Taney making an occasional appearance. However, Taney did not miss the chance to travel to Washington to argue for states' rights versus the Fifth Amendment and, in particular, for Baltimore's right not to be obliged to pay Barren any damages. Taney and Mayer sat facing the seven justices, with Chief Justice Marshall in the middle; one ancient Federalist surrounded by Republi- cans. Marshall, now 75, was frail and greying, his body still weak from a bladder operation the year before. The golden age of the Marshall Court was ending. The chief justice had suffered two major defeats. The more severe blow was an emotional one—the death of his wife, Polly, on Decem- ber 26, 1831.32 The second defeat had come in 1832, when President Andrew Jackson refused to enforce Marshall's decision in Worcester v. Georgia.33 In that case the Court had ruled that Georgia had no legislative authority over Cherokee Nation lands and ordered the release of a mis- sionary prosecuted under an unconstitutional Georgia statute which for- bade white people from being on Indian lands. On hearing Marshall's opinion, President Andrew Jackson is reported to have said, "John Mar- shall made his decision, now let him enforce it." Whether the story is apocryphal or not, Jackson never moved to enforce the court order, and Georgia did not release missionary Worcester, though he was later par- doned by the governor. Attorney Mayer, speaking for dock owner Barron, was the first to address the Court. He never got to talk about the wharf and the silt. He was immediately directed by the justices to confine "the argument to the question whether, under the amendment to the constitution the court had jurisdiction of the case." According to the court reporter, Mayer argued that the city's "exercise of authority was repugnant to the Constitution *In the time that elapsed between the argument ofBarron and the decision, Taney was elevated from attorney general of Maryland to attorney general of the United States.