|
oOGC
129
September 17, 1902, from Titus to Fumphrey, which contained false statements in regard to said Vain, and that said letter was offered in evidence in open Court in the Fisher case and in the Guy case to discredit the said Wein, but that when this informant desired access to said letter on the 27th of October, 1902, said Fumphrey did state to this Board that this informant should not have access to said letter because it was in the nature of a confidential communication from a fellow detective in New York.
IX.
That said Fumphrey testified under oath in the Guy case that he had not in any way whatever communicated to Robert II. McLane, State's Attorney for Baltimore City, any information concerning the character or reputation of the said Wein, who was, as hereinbefore set out, a witness in certain liquor cases in Baltimore City to be summoned on behalf of the State.
X.
Your informant further states that it made an investigation into the character and reputation of its said agents, the said V/ein and the said Gpcrzel, before their employment by it, and again in the interval between the trial of the Fisher case and the trial of the Guy case at Bel Air, and stands ready to prove to your Board "hat they are worthy of belief.
Your informant therefore requests the Board to fix a day for the public hearing of this complaint, so that it may produce witnesses to prove the facts herein set forth, and requests that State's Attorney Robert M. McLane may be summoned as a witness to give such testimony as may be pertinent .
Respectfully submitted,
(signed)------MORRIS A. S0F2R
Attorney for the Maryland Anti-Saloon League.
( signed)-----S.E.Nicholson,
Superintendent of the Maryland Anti-Saloon League.
At 2.50 P.M., the Board adjourned the case until ten o'clock
Tuesday November 25, 1902.
|
